The Breakdown: Do Presidential Speeches Matter?

The Breakdown: Do Presidential Speeches Matter?

The Breakdown: Do Presidential Speeches Matter?

Ever since his breakthrough keynote at the 2004 DNC, Barack Obama has been defined by his oratory skills. But has his rhetoric really advanced his policy goals? On this week’s edition of The Breakdown, Chris Hayes talks to political scientist George C. Edwards III about the impact presidential speeches have on public opinion and political change.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Ever since his breakthrough keynote speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, Barack Obama has been defined by his oratory skills. For many of the major issues of his presidency, health care reform for example, Obama has turned to major speeches to help shape public opinion. But with legislative disappointments like inaction on climate change and seeming impotence to halt BP’s oil spill piling up, many on the left are starting to question whether the president is doing enough to advance his agenda. On this week’s edition of The Breakdown, The Nation’s Washington Editor Christopher Hayes talks to political scientist George C. Edwards III about what impact, if any, presidential rhetoric has on public opinion and political change.

The Breakdown Ever since his breakthrough keynote speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, Barack Obama has been defined by his oratory skills. For many of the major issues of his presidency, health care reform for example, Obama has turned to major speeches to help shape public opinion. But with legislative disappointments like inaction on climate change and seeming impotence to halt BP’s oil spill piling up, many on the left are starting to question whether the president is doing enough to advance his agenda. On this week’s edition of The Breakdown, The Nation‘s Washington Editor Christopher Hayes talks to political scientist George C. Edwards III about what impact, if any, presidential rhetoric has on public opinion and political change.

 

Related Links

More information on Professor Edwards.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x