Ars Magna

Ars Magna

The great art of anagrams

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

[First off, links to the current puzzle and solving guidelines.]

Early on in our stint as The Nation’s cryptic constructors, we heard complaints from more than one solver that our puzzles contained too many anagrams. At the same time, we heard from a friend who was helping a newbie learn about cryptics that she loved the anagrams, because even as a beginner, she could solve them! And there’s the conundrum in a nutshell. We don’t have a quota for how many of instances of each clue type we use in each puzzle, but when it comes to anagrams, it’s generally true that beginners want more of them and experienced solvers want fewer. Our hope is that we will err in both directions, visiting every proportion between the extremes and thus occasionally hitting the exactly right mix for each solver.

An anagram is a rearrangement of the letters of a word or phrase that yields another word or phrase. For example, in Puzzle 3205, we used the fact that the letters in CROATIANS can be rearranged to spell “raincoats”:
CROATIANS …tattered raincoats for Southern Europeans (9)

An anagram clue in a cryptic requires a definition (“Southern Europeans,” in the example above), some anagram fodder (the words whose letters will be rearranged, in this case “raincoats”) and an anagram indicator, which serves as an instruction to the solver (“tattered”). It’s hard to argue that “tattered” indicates the rearranging of letters, but any experienced solver of cryptic crosswords will have no trouble guessing that’s what’s going on. Certainly, there is a wide range of words that indicate anagrams. Some cryptic cognoscenti insist that only words that indicate disorder can be used as indicators. A typical example of the latter appeared in Puzzle 3208:
DADAISTS Sad, staid, upset, and provocative artists (8)
Here “upset” is the indicator, “sad, staid” is the fodder, and “provocative artists,” of course, is the definition.

However, there are other possibilities for anagram indicators. For example, words that make reference to sequencing without indicating disorder might be used, as in this clue from Puzzle 3220:
WOZNIAK Tech pioneer: “I know A-Z, but in a different order” (7)

A favorite anagram indicator of our predecessor Frank Lewis was “sort.” We used it in this clue in Puzzle 3226:
LAICISM Sort of Islamic philosophy of church-state separation (7)

Notice that these examples have between 7 and 9 letters, which strikes us as the most satisfying range for anagrams. Very short anagrams are perhaps too easy to solve, and can only be justified with a very natural surface reading. Here’s one from Puzzle 3218:
LIDS Tops slid off (4)
(Yes, “off” is a legitimate anagram indicator.)

In the case of long entries, we consider anagrams a last resort. The English language is such that a fourteen- or fifteen-letter phrase can always be rearranged into something else. Take KLEENEX TISSUES, which might appear unfriendly with that K and that X. Nevertheless, the Internet Anagram Server spits out 6,996 anagrams for those letters. Perhaps one of those could be used in a cryptic clue, but it was so much better to clue this with a charade (KLEE + NEXT + ISSUES in Puzzle 3199):
KLEENEX TISSUES Painter subsequently produces things to sneeze at? (7,7)

That said, we are sometimes forced to anagram a long entry, for lack of a better idea. Here’s an example from Puzzle 3232:
RENE DESCARTES Mathematician-philosopher misplaced decent erasers (4,9)

How do you feel about anagrams in clues? Do you have favorite anagram clues you came across or created? Please share below, where you can also post comments, questions, kudos, or complaints about last week’s puzzle or any previous puzzle.

NOTE ABOUT PUZZLE 3238
The clue for 1D was based on an idea from puzzle master and humorist Francis Heaney. We’ve been wanting to steal this for a cryptic clue ever since we started, but we had to wait for the blog so we could credit him.

SPOILER! PUZZLE 3239: HINTS FOR BEGINNERS  
These clues in puzzle 3239 are anagrams: 12A, 14A, 23A, 24A, 21D.
These clues involve anagrams as part of the wordplay: 28A, 29A, 2D, 4D, 17D.

 

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x