Cryptic Parlor Game

Cryptic Parlor Game

My first is a burn, my second is a drink, my whole puts them together.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

[First off, links to the current puzzle and solving guidelines]

The charade is a basic type of cryptic clue in which the entry is broken up into consecutive chunks. These are then defined one after the other, with the definition of the whole coming first or last. This is not unlike the parlor game of charades, or the classic verse charades. For example, from Puzzle 3227:
GORGONZOLA Ugly female novelist makes cheese (10)
Or, from Puzzle 3236:
FLAGELLATED Jack Fitzgerald Kennedy is whipped (11)
(For the latter, we were not sure that “jack” would be recognized as a synonym of “flag,” but the surface of the clue was appealing, and we figured that those solvers who did not feel like looking it up might be satisfied by making the connection with the well-known “Union Jack.”)

The parts of a charade need not be defined in order—but if they’re not, the clue should indicate that explicitly. For example, from Puzzle 3223:
ASTROPHYSICS Science attacks, following baseball team’s award (12)
Here “following” indicates that SICS comes at the end. 
Or from Puzzle 3213:
CARGO PLANE Republicans invading a vehicle passage with a commercial aircraft (5,5)
In this case “invading” indicates that GOP goes in between the other two parts.

A charade may be phonetic, or (to use the lingo of the parlor game) based on “sounds like.” Two examples, respectively from puzzles 3207 and 3214:
UVULA Say, you have… you will… uh… something hanging down the back of your throat (5)
EYEHOLE  Through it, you can see or hear the ego, undivided (7)
The solutions sound like “you’ve you’ll uh” and “I, whole.”

In general, we try to avoid partially phonetic clues, i.e., clues in which one part is phonetic and another is literal. This is not really a rule so much as an aesthetic preference, and something we do violate occasionally. In Puzzle 3204, for instance:
EYESORE Ugly sight and sound of material from which diamonds can be extracted? (7)
In this case, “ice” is phonetic, but “ore” is not.

Finally, there is a type of charade where the cluing is not piecewise but global, cluing “the whole thing.” Here are two examples (respectively from puzzles 3216 and 3233:
BRAINWASH Woman’s laundry list item: indoctrinate (9)
AMPHITHEATER Band’s equipment collided with radiator in auditorium (12)
Perhaps these are not exactly charades, but more like double definitions involving deceptive spacing. (In the argot of the National Puzzlers’ League, they are “heteronyms,” words or phrases that are spelled the same, except perhaps for spacing, and may be pronounced differently.)

Sometimes this leads to the parts being clued out of order, with no explicit indication of that, as in this case, from Puzzle 3232:
GAS PEDAL “It makes the car go,” Unser said with difficulty (3,5)

“Unser“ comes before “said with difficulty” in the clue, even though AL comes after GASPED in the answer. This does not happen often, but it is justified by the global nature of the clue.

Whole-thing charades, or heteronyms, have been among the most popular among our test solvers. One last example, from Puzzle 3199:
ALLEN SCREW Piece of equipment for Midnight in Paris gaffers (5,5)
We later found out that it includes a factual error: it turns out that the credits for Midnight in Paris list only a single gaffer. Presumably this did not prevent anyone from solving the clue.

Do you have favorite charade clues? Please share them below, where you can also post comments, questions, kudos or complaints about last week’s puzzle or any previous puzzle.

SPOILER ALERT! HINTS FOR BEGINNERS FOR PUZZLE #3241

These clues are charades: 11A, 12A, 17A, 26A, 1D, 2D

These clues break the entry into consecutive pieces, like a charade, but involve further wordplay on one or more piece: 9A, 14A, 5D, 16D

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x