Kerry’s Mission to Moscow

Kerry’s Mission to Moscow

After meeting with Putin, the secretary of state calls for a new US-Russian partnership—but can he enact it?

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Nation contributing editor Stephen F. Cohen and John Batchelor continue their weekly discussions of the new US-Russian cold war. American Secretary of State Kerry’s meeting with Russian President Putin, on December 15, frames the discussion.

Cohen interprets Kerry’s public remark that when Washington and Moscow work together, good things happen, as a call for a partnership in resolving the Ukrainian conflict and for a coalition against the Islamic State in Syria—in effect, a major departure from current Obama administration policy of cold war and “isolating Russia.” But will Kerry be backed by the White House, Cohen asks, recalling that a similar initiative by Kerry in May was torpedoed by Vice President Biden and his allies in the State Department and Senate.

Cohen and Bachelor then discuss the mounting crises in Ukraine and Syria, the main topics of the Kerry-Putin meeting, and how the United States and Russia might cooperate in coping with them. In this connection, Cohen points to the decision the European Union will make later this week about whether or not to end its economic sanctions against Russia, noting that several European governments, led by Italy, want the sanctions ended, but that under US pressure they will probably be extended, however incongruously.

Cohen also notes a series of recent anti-Russian provocations, including the Turkish shooting-down of a Russian warplane and a more recent incident at sea, that seem to be a coordinated political war against Russia. He asks, are the people behind these provocations—in Washington, Brussels and elsewhere—aware that they are risking actual war with Russia, or do they actually seek it?

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x