Bernie Sanders Set the Tone in the South Carolina Democratic Debate

Bernie Sanders Set the Tone in the South Carolina Democratic Debate

Bernie Sanders Set the Tone in the South Carolina Democratic Debate

Clinton remains a formidable candidate, but at times it was possible to forget she was even on stage.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

CharlestonIf presidential debates really were scored liked boxing matches, you’d have to call tonight’s bout a split decision. Bernie Sanders supporters will have been cheered by their candidate’s counter-punching against the Clinton attacks, telegraphed in the press all week, on his call for truly universal health coverage. And they did cheer, loudly, at his relentless jabs at our corrupt political system, which persistently thwarts any effort to reform our rigged economy.

Meanwhile, partisans of Hillary Clinton will point with pride to her effective flurry of blows on gun control, her obvious command of foreign policy (and inscrutable smile when asked about her relationship with Vladimir Putin), and, most of all, the way she used President Obama as a human shield all night long. It was as if Clinton was following her own weird variation of a rope-a-dope strategy: Instead of draping herself over her opponent, she wrapped her arms around an imaginary Obama and held on for dear life. From healthcare to the economy, her answer was always: I Heart Obama. At one point she even turned a question about her ties to Wall Street into an attempt to depict Sanders as an enemy of Obama.

Will it work? We won’t really even begin to know until February 27, when the South Carolina primary will show whether Clinton’s purported appeal to African-American voters—the obvious target of so many of her comments tonight—holds up. Waiting to get into the Gaillard Center tonight, I saw a lot of African-American elected officials with Hillary pins. And the Bernie supporters rallying outside the hall here in Charleston were the same crowd of earnest young, mostly white hipsters I’d already seen in Iowa, Nevada, and New Hampshire. The Sanders people can’t be happy about that.

But there was also an air of desperation about Clinton’s newfound respect for the wisdom of South Carolina voters—the same people who in 2008 were dismissed by Bill Clinton, following Obama’s victory here, because they’d also voted twice for Jesse Jackson. The same whiff of fear was also evident in the Clinton campaign’s decision to go on the attack. The campaign even put out a press release calling Friends of the Earth Action a “dark money group” after it bought TV ads praising Sanders for leading the fight against the Keystone XL pipeline.

Even boxing matches aren’t only scored on the basis of punches landed. There is also the question of who controlled the ring, and here Sanders was the obvious winner. Unlike all three of their previous encounters, tonight it was Sanders who set the tone, dominated the discussion, and whose campaign themes—healthcare and the economy—were the focus of the moderators’ questions.

Hillary remains a formidable candidate—and the odds-on favorite here in South Carolina. And she handled an excruciatingly awkward question about her husband’s infidelity with winning dignity—aided yet again by Sanders’s refusal to play the mainstream media game.

But there were moments—like the exchange between a visionary O’Malley and a presidential-sounding Sanders on climate change—where it was possible to forget Clinton was even on stage. For a candidate whose appeal is so tied to her inevitability, that can’t be encouraging.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x