The United States of Anxiety, Episode 3: Just How Broken Is Our Immigration System?

The United States of Anxiety, Episode 3: Just How Broken Is Our Immigration System?

The United States of Anxiety, Episode 3: Just How Broken Is Our Immigration System?

Donald Trump wants to deport undocumented immigrants and send them “to the back of the line.” What line is he even talking about?

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Tom McCarthy, a retired NYPD detective and lifelong Long Island resident, has spent much of his adult life straddling two very different worlds. Each day he would leave the calm of his suburban community to patrol the notorious Queensbridge housing projects. This was in 1989, at the height of the crack epidemic, and what Tom saw in New York’s public housing felt worlds away from his suburban Eden.

But now, the line that once separated Tom’s home from his work feels like it’s dissipating. It’s exemplified by leafy Suffolk County leading all of New York state in heroin overdose deaths last year.

What’s brought about this change in the suburbs? For many, the problems seem to be coming from the outside, in the form of lawlessness sneaking over our southern border. Donald Trump has repeatedly bemoaned the crime and drugs that he says undocumented Mexican immigrants are bringing into the United States. He has said he’ll deport this population and send them to “the back of the line.”

But of all the controversial things the Republican nominee has said, the idea of making undocumented immigrants begin their immigration back at square one is actually quite mainstream. In fact, it’s been advocated by both Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama. The idea projects order and a sense of fairness. There’s only one problem, according to Celinda Lake, a Democratic strategist who helped to workshop “the back of the line” phrase in the early 2000s: The immigration line doesn’t exist, leaving the country’s immigration process a hopeless hall of mirrors for people trying to do the right thing and enter the country legally.

Episode Contributors:
Arun Venugopal
Julianne Hing

Subscribe to the podcast on iTunes.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x