Trump Is Using Pandemic Panic to Ramp Up Attacks on Migrants

Trump Is Using Pandemic Panic to Ramp Up Attacks on Migrants

Trump Is Using Pandemic Panic to Ramp Up Attacks on Migrants

This has nothing to do with public health and everything to do with locking out poor and brown people.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

EDITOR’S NOTE: The Nation believes that helping readers stay informed about the impact of the coronavirus crisis is a form of public service. For that reason, this article, and all of our coronavirus coverage, is now free. Please subscribe to support our writers and staff, and stay healthy.

The Signal this week: After ignoring the severity of the coronavirus threat to global health and the global economy for more than a month, and then underplaying the likelihood of community transmission in the United States, the Trump administration is now rushing to use the outbreak to further its political goals on immigration. Witness the discussions now underway to close the southern border, just when the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit seems poised to block the ghastly Migrant Protection Protocols, which force tens of thousands of asylum seekers to remain in camps on the Mexican side of the border.

Fulfilling this Stephen Miller wish list has nothing to do with public health and everything to do with locking out poor and brown people. Like the Justice Department’s new Denaturalization Section, unveiled by the administration this week, which makes it easier to take US citizenship and passports away from naturalized citizens who have been convicted of crimes—this is part of a project to fundamentally redefine who should and shouldn’t be American. These actions are straight out of the fascist playbook, yet they were drowned out by other events. Surely it’s no coincidence that such an office was established in the shadows, at a time of pandemic panic, when it was guaranteed to receive little notice.

If the administration—which dismantled the country’s pandemic response systems in the first years of Trump’s presidency—were even remotely competent, it would be ramping up airport health checks and ensuring that passengers spend less time in long and densely packed airport lines. After all, “social spacing” is one of the few tools we have in the fight to slow the virus’s spread. Instead, the administration is pinching pennies. As the summer travel season nears, the Transportation Security Administration announced both a hiring freeze and a strict limit on overtime for existing staff.

Instead of getting the attention they deserve, these developments are being drowned out by the Noise: by Trump’s bleating about Democrats’ wanting open borders, and about the coronavirus being their “new hoax”; by Trump’s trolling the Democratic presidential hopefuls, holding rallies in primary states.

Meanwhile, Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, is leading a loyalty putsch, providing the administration with lists of officials it should purge for not being sufficiently enthusiastic about the person and policies of Trump.

In 2018, Chief Justice John Roberts rebuked Trump for talking dismissively about “Obama judges.” Roberts averred, “We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges. What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them.” That was disingenuous then, and it’s even more disingenuous now. Clearly, judicial appointments are political; and with a Supreme Court justice’s wife now demanding that civil servants essentially pass a presidential loyalty test, the idea that her husband—a reliable vote on behalf of every Trump policy that has come before the court these past three years—is a neutral arbiter is laughable.

Imagine the conservative howls of outrage if a close relative of Justice Sonia Sotomayor or Ruth Bader Ginsburg were to head a group demanding loyalty tests on behalf of Bernie Sanders. It’s unthinkable that Rush Limbaugh and his crowd wouldn’t be calling for heads to roll. Yet, in this degraded political environment, with Trump’s cult of personality, it’s considered OK for Ginni Thomas to act in this manner.

That’s the Signal. Stay strong and stay healthy—and don’t get distracted by the chatter.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x