Biden Meets, and Defeats, the Press

Biden Meets, and Defeats, the Press

The president should postpone future news conferences. Not because he can’t handle them—but because the White House press corps can’t.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The White House press corps recently elevated President Joe Biden’s “delay” in holding a press conference to the level of a scandal. The narrative was that he couldn’t handle the unscripted format—because of dementia, gaffes, other “Uncle Joe” problems, or all of the above.

Finally, two whole months into his presidency, he scheduled one. And it was a disaster.

For the White House press corps.

I admit, I worried about Biden at first. At the outset, he seemed to be reading from notes on the lectern. It was only when the questions began that he came alive. But some of his questioners did not.

Predictably, and fairly, Biden faced multiple questions about the so-called “crisis” at the border. But he fended off several odd queries about whether somehow his reputation for decency was attracting more migrants. He answered, correctly, that the surge is a seasonal thing: “They come because this is the time of year when the journey is most survivable.” When ABC’s Cecilia Vega asked if the currently terrible conditions for child migrants at the Donna, Tex., facility are “acceptable” to him, he shot back, “That’s a serious question, right? Is it acceptable to me? Come on.”

He went on to say about children: “The idea that I’m going to say, which I would never do, if an unaccompanied child ends up at the border we’re going to let them starve to death and stay on the other side, no previous administration did that either, except Trump. I’m not going to do it. I’m not going to do it.” He traced the steps a parent might go through deciding to send their child north more than once, concluding, “What a desperate act,” and added that “I make no apology” for ending Trump policies of separating children from their mothers.

As president, Biden is responsible for conditions at the border, and immigration and asylum policies. This is an awful problem morally, politically, and logistically. Ultimately, he might not handle it well. But he handled loaded questions with moral passion and clarity.

As he did with questions about the wave of voter suppression laws pushed by Republicans across the country. “What I’m worried about is how un-American this whole initiative is,” Biden said. “It’s sick. It’s sick.” (He said it made “Jim Crow look like Jim Eagle,” which confused a lot of people, and probably wasn’t the most apt analogy, but he made the necessary point: It’s really bad.) He also sounded more than open to doing away with the filibuster for voting rights bills, and maybe more—one substantive takeaway from an otherwise pretty frivolous hour. Frivolous because of the questions, not Biden’s answers.

The president was asked not only if he is going to run again in 2024—predictably, he said that was his “plan,” with Kamala Harris by his side—but whom he expected to run against. “I don’t even know if there will be a Republican Party [four years from now].” To me, that was actually the news in his remark, but I saw reporters leading with the fact that he said he’d run again. As if he could say anything else.

Biden opened by saying he was increasing his vaccine goal to 200 million doses in 100 days. He didn’t get one single question about the pandemic—the best proof that he’s handling it well. But can these people even see themselves?

I say this so often it should become my e-mail signature or my Twitter bio: I didn’t support Biden in the primaries; I didn’t even think he should run. Of course, I supported him once he became the nominee. But he’s surpassed my limited expectations. His cabinet and other appointments have been excellent, as is his American Rescue Plan. I give his first press conference delivery equally high marks—and I hope the White House press corps tries to rise to the level of his performance, because that was a shit show.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x