In the “Year of Elections,” Is AI on the Ballot?
Politicians like Pakistan’s Imran Khan have found themselves duplicated by artificial intelligence—sometimes by their own parties.
On December 17, 2023, more than a million supporters of Imran Khan, the former prime minister of Pakistan, fired up their browsers to take part in Pakistan’s first ever virtual rally. Khan’s party, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf (PTI), has been the subject of a brutal crackdown by the country’s powerful military establishment, after thousands of his supporters laid siege to military installations in opposition to his arrest last May. Toward the end of the nearly five-hour virtual event—which was made necessary by the restrictions placed on the party assembling in public—something seemingly inexplicable happened. Viewers were treated to a keynote speech by Khan himself, in spite of his being incarcerated in Adiala Jail. “You all must be wondering how I’m doing in prison,” he said. “The first thing I want to make clear is that if it brings Pakistan true freedom, living in jail for me is an act of worship.”
In actual fact, the voice was not that of Imran Khan. The digital media team of the PTI had trained an artificial intelligence program to mimic Khan’s speech patterns by feeding it a selection of his oratory, and then used the clone to deliver a speech based on notes smuggled out of prison by the PTI chairman’s lawyers.
“What we wanted to give the audience was the feeling that Imran Khan was there, but with the disclaimer that this was the AI voice of Imran Khan based on his notes from jail,” says Chicago-based Khan loyalist, Jibran Ilyas, who masterminded the initiative. “It helped us get his message across, and that’s the most important thing, because people are really looking at him to guide not just the PTI but Pakistan as a whole.”
In 2024, a year when it is estimated that more than 2 billion people worldwide will go to the polls to choose their representatives, policymakers, and strategists have begun to turn their eyes toward the possibility of artificial intelligence playing a decisive role in global democracy. Kat Duffy of the Council of Foreign Relations has described the current environment as a “post-market, pre-norms space,” one where emergent technologies have entered the marketplace but the regulation to control their output is yet to be determined.
Throughout South Asia, machine-learning and AI technologies have already begun to play a significant role in the democratic process. There is the now infamous case of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, whose AI-cloned voice has been made to sing songs in a variety of regional languages he is known not to speak—an innovation that raises the possibility of the same being done to make his speeches accessible in parts of the country where Hindi is either not the first language or is poorly understood.
In Pakistan, commentators and digital media specialists have hailed PTI’s strategy as a significant milestone. “I thought it was a pretty effective way of circumventing the persecution that the political party has been facing,” says Islamabad-based digital rights activist, Usama Khilji. “Now you have a dude who’s in jail addressing everyone through AI because you can, so I thought it was pretty innovative.”
The recently concluded election in Bangladesh, however, became a case study in how artificial intelligence can be used to peddle disinformation, particularly among voters who lack the sophistication to differentiate between authentic audiovisual content and deepfake clones. In one instance, an AI-generated video posted on Facebook showed exiled opposition leader Tarique Rahman arguing that his political party, the BNP, ought to placate the United States by keeping quiet about the Israeli offensive in Gaza—a potentially disastrous position to take in a country where more than 90 percent of the population is Muslim.
A report by the Financial Times published last month uncovered a campaign of disinformation in Bangladesh, where pro-government news outlets were promoting deepfakes and other AI-created media to manipulate public opinion in the run-up to the January 7 general election. Sayeed Al-Zaman, a Bangladeshi academic whose research focuses on digital information, believes that “tools and techniques such as deepfakes, autogenerated content, and AI bots could become potent carriers of political propaganda” in Bangladesh and worldwide.
According to Al-Zaman, whose research indicates that over 60 percent of individuals exposed to online disinformation are susceptible to believing it, the advent of artificial intelligence has made the challenge of verification more difficult for two reasons. “Firstly, effective AI-based misinformation detection tools are not yet widely available, making it difficult for the masses to discern between fact and fiction,” he tells The Nation. “Secondly, digital information literacy offers limited assistance in cases of AI-based misinformation due to its heightened level of sophistication.”
Even in the United States, AI-generated content has been deployed in attempts to influence voters. On Monday, NBC News reported that a robocall featuring an AI voice clone of President Biden was being used to discourage New Hampshire residents from voting in its presidential primary. Last year, deepfake photographs surfaced on social media showing Donald Trump wrestling with police officers.
In November, social-media giant Meta announced that it would require political campaigns to disclose their use of artificial intelligence in advertisements published on all of its platforms, a policy meant to be rolled out this month. But at precisely the moment when the need for content moderation has reached its highest point, the tech sector is experiencing mass layoffs. Last year, Twitter instituted a number of cuts to its trust and safety team under the leadership of Elon Musk—a decision that was copied by a number of other tech giants including Meta and Amazon. All in all, the industry tracker Layoffs.fyi estimates that around 250,000 tech workers were let go in 2023.
The implications for the Global South are obvious; in a country like Pakistan, where 60 million people are classified as illiterate, the electorate is ripe for manipulation. But the danger of election interference is also considerable in affluent countries, where these AI technologies are at their most developed and sophisticated. It is not out of the question that 2024, which has been dubbed the year of the election, turns out instead to be the year of misinformation.
Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation
Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.
We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.
In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen.
Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering.
With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now.
While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account.
I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.
Onward,
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and publisher, The Nation
More from The Nation
The Supreme Court v. My Mother The Supreme Court v. My Mother
After my mother escaped the Holocaust, she broke the law to save her family. Her immigration story is more pertinent today than ever before.
The Supreme Court Has a Serial Killer Problem The Supreme Court Has a Serial Killer Problem
In this week's Elie v. U.S., The Nation’s justice correspondent recaps a major death penalty case that came before the high court as well as the shenanigans of a man who’s angling...
Corporate Democrats Are Foolishly Surrendering the AI Fight Corporate Democrats Are Foolishly Surrendering the AI Fight
Voters want the party to get tough on the industry. But Democratic leaders are following the money instead.
Marching Against a Corrupt Regime Marching Against a Corrupt Regime
People taking to the streets for democracy.
Keeping the Police Out of Pregnancy Care Keeping the Police Out of Pregnancy Care
We must be vigilant in keeping law enforcement out of exam rooms.
