March 18, 2025

Peace, Not Surrender for Ukraine

We now have a chance to seize the opportunity that we failed to seize after the end of the Cold War.

Anatol Lieven
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, right, and other cabinet members, applaud President Donald Trump’s remarks about peace with Russia at a joint session of Congress at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, March 4, 2025.(J. Scott Applewhite / AP Photos)

There are so many points on which to condemn the domestic and foreign policies of the Trump administration that just to list them would take an entire article; but the Ukraine peace process is not among them. If any Nation readers are apt to be swayed by all the hysterical talk of Trump’s “betraying” Ukraine, “serving Putin,” “abandoning Europe” and creating a “new Yalta agreement,” I would urge them to read the angry and fearful responses of Russian hard-liners to the US-Ukrainian call for a ceasefire. These Russian hawks do not see the latest ceasefire proposal as in Russia’s favor. They see it as a “treacherous” move by Washington and Kyiv to deprive Russia of the great victory for which they hope.

So far, the Trump administration’s approach, while undeniably crude, has also been undeniably effective. The Ukrainian government has been forced to abandon its impossible conditions for peace and to call for a ceasefire. Together with the resumption of US aid to Ukraine, this has placed the Russian government under huge pressure to compromise.

As Marco Rubio has said, “the ball is now in Russia’s court.” Now that the US is no longer seeking Russia’s defeat, if the Russian government sticks to its own impossible conditions, then it will run two great risks: that further Russian military advances will continue to be so slow, at such cost, and for so little gain that serious opposition to the war will emerge among ordinary Russians; and that Trump, deprived of his hope to be seen as a historic peacemaker, will himself swing towards implacable hostility to Russia.

That does not mean that the Russian government will simply agree to an early temporary ceasefire without preconditions—something that it has always rejected. Ambassador Yuri Ushakov, a top adviser to Putin, and one of the Russian negotiators with Washington, has said that “Russia’s goal is still a long-term peaceful settlement…[that] takes into account the legitimate interests of our country.… Steps that imitate peaceful actions, it seems to me, are of no use to anyone.”

Some things really do need to be settled (at least in outline) in advance of a ceasefire; otherwise the war will only resume later. Among them is the composition of a UN peacekeeping force. Russia has categorically rejected European peacekeepers, which it sees (rightly), as simply NATO by another name. If the Ukrainians and Europeans continue to try to insert this into a peace agreement, there will be no peace. Russia will however need to reaffirm publicly its agreement to Ukraine seeking membership in the European Union.

There will need to be a firm promise to suspend some sanctions against Russia, and on how to use the $300 billion in seized Russian assets to rebuild Ukraine (including the Russian-occupied territories). Both Russia and Ukraine will have to undertake not to change the ceasefire line by force. That will involve Russia giving up its hope of capturing the rest of the four provinces that it claims to have annexed, and Ukraine giving up the hope of recapturing its own lost territories. Any restrictions on Ukrainian arms will require an element of reciprocity, ideally in a wider framework of European arms reduction talks.

Current Issue

Cover of April 2025 Issue

A peace agreement along these lines would not mean Ukrainian “surrender.” By far the greater part of Ukraine would remain independent, heavily armed for defense, and with a path (albeit one that is likely to prove very difficult) toward membership of the EU and integration into the West.

It is, of course, horribly difficult for the left in the United States and Europe to support anything that Trump does; but in the case of the Ukraine peace process, they should do so; for the alternatives are becoming clearer with every passing day: in Europe, a turn to something much more like the 19th-century “national liberalism” of Germany, Spain, or Italy: dedicated to certain forms of bourgeois “progress,” but strongly authoritarian and militarist, limiting or manipulating the vote to keep liberal elites in power, and legitimizing its rule largely through appeals to nationalism. In the case of the United States, this kind of liberalism will be turbo-charged with anti-Russian (and, for different reasons, anti-Muslim) hatred and paranoia. In the process, among all the other things already being thrown overboard to save money for increased spending on weapons is European action against climate change—a threat to Europe that dwarfs that from Russia.

Where this can lead is already apparent in Romania. However much one may loathe Calin Georgescu for his sympathy for Romania’s fascist regime of the 1940s and mock him for his conspiracy theories (including denial of the moon landings), it should be obvious that the means adopted by the Romanian establishment to disqualify him from running for president have been totally illegitimate and undemocratic, and have relied on the fabrication of a Russian plot where none in fact existed.

On that, at least, JD Vance’s lecture to the Europeans had a point. The EU has encouraged this attempt to nullify an election by one of its member states, and acquiesced in the suppression of the protests that have resulted. This path leads to dictatorship, supported by the EU and NATO in the name of resistance to Russia—perhaps rather like Greece under the military dictatorship of 1967–74, supported by the West as part of the Cold War with the USSR.

The Nation Weekly

Fridays. A weekly digest of the best of our coverage.
By signing up, you confirm that you are over the age of 16 and agree to receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You may unsubscribe or adjust your preferences at any time. You can read our Privacy Policy here.

In the US, the Democratic Party will be locked into permanent hostility to Russia, justified by ever more outrageous exaggerations of the Russian threat to the US, and in alliance with the most stupid and retrograde elements of the US military, intelligence community, and security establishment. Since there is no sign as yet of the Democratic establishment reducing its commitment to Israel or its hostility to Iran and China, the Democratic Party would become in effect the party of US militarism and the pursuit of US global primacy by military means.

Before embarking on this disastrous course, Democrats should recall how the Cold War began, and how it ended. As with support to Ukraine to resist the Russian invasion of February 2022, the creation of NATO and the containment of the Soviet Union were necessary in response to Stalinist expansionism and tyranny; but the intellectual architect of containment, George Kennan, came to deplore the way in which it was increasingly defined in hyper-militarized terms, driven and justified by paranoid exaggerations of the Soviet menace. The result in the short term was McCarthyism; in the longer term, the creation of a US national security state and military-industrial complex that previous generations of Americans would have regarded as contrary to core American values and traditions.

The Cold War ended thanks to Mikhail Gorbachev; and those of us old enough to remember that time should make it our business publicly to recall the adulation for “Gorby” that swept the West, and Gorbachev’s later bitter criticisms of the way in which the US and its European allies had helped to betray and destroy his vision of a “Common European Home” through the expansion of NATO and unilateral US acts of aggression, intervention, and wanton contempt for Russian interests (he also strongly condemned aspects of Putin’s regime). Kennan too strongly opposed NATO expansion in the 1990s.

Otto von Bismarck once said that making laws is like making sausages—one should not look too closely into how it is done. The same could be said about peace agreements. We now have a second chance to seize the opportunity that we failed to seize after the end of the Cold War, of a Europe at peace due to a security architecture that includes rather than excludes Russia, and free to devote its resources to the well-being of its citizens and of humanity, not to weapons. We should not reject that chance just because it is Donald Trump and Marco Rubio who offer it to us.

Support independent journalism that exposes oligarchs and profiteers


Donald Trump’s cruel and chaotic second term is just getting started. In his first month back in office, Trump and his lackey Elon Musk (or is it the other way around?) have proven that nothing is safe from sacrifice at the altar of unchecked power and riches.

Only robust independent journalism can cut through the noise and offer clear-eyed reporting and analysis based on principle and conscience. That’s what The Nation has done for 160 years and that’s what we’re doing now.

Our independent journalism doesn’t allow injustice to go unnoticed or unchallenged—nor will we abandon hope for a better world. Our writers, editors, and fact-checkers are working relentlessly to keep you informed and empowered when so much of the media fails to do so out of credulity, fear, or fealty.

The Nation has seen unprecedented times before. We draw strength and guidance from our history of principled progressive journalism in times of crisis, and we are committed to continuing this legacy today.

We’re aiming to raise $25,000 during our Spring Fundraising Campaign to ensure that we have the resources to expose the oligarchs and profiteers attempting to loot our republic. Stand for bold independent journalism and donate to support The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel

Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Anatol Lieven

Anatol Lieven is co-author with George Beebe and Mark Episkopos of the policy brief, Peace Through Strength in Ukraine, published by the Quincy Institute for International Peace.

More from The Nation

Fishermen work on the ice of the Gulf of Finland against the backdrop of the nuclear icebreaker Yakutia, a key tool in Russia's Arctic program, while US President Donald Trump has ordered the development and approval of a program to acquire a US icebreaker fleet.

A New Age for US-Russia Arctic Cooperation? A New Age for US-Russia Arctic Cooperation?

Ceasefire talks could be a catalyst for advancing cooperation in the Arctic, but the climate crisis should not be forgotten.

Pavel Devyatkin

Protesters carrying a placard showing former president Rodrigo Duterte are blocked by anti-riot policemen near Malacanang palace in Manila, 2025.

Rodrigo Duterte Is at the Hague. What’s Next for the Philippines? Rodrigo Duterte Is at the Hague. What’s Next for the Philippines?

His arrest by the ICC was a monumental step in prosecuting his bloody drug war. But it’s also the latest episode in a battle between the Philippines’ two political dynasties.

Walden Bello

Palestinian children and journalists disperse as Israeli tanks enter the Jenin camp for Palestinian refugees in the occupied West Bank, on February 23, 2025.

Why Palestinians Can’t Sleep Why Palestinians Can’t Sleep

Sleep deprivation is a form of torture. For Palestinians, it’s a regular way of life.

Zehra Imam

People gather against a backdrop of unlit buildings in Havana, as Cuba’s national power grid has effectively collapsed.

Life in Cuba Under Sanctions Life in Cuba Under Sanctions

Ordinary Cubans are trapped in a vicious circle of government mismanagement exacerbated by the US embargo.

Feature / David Montgomery

South African farmer Tewie Wessels addresses a group of white South Africans supporting US President Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk during a demonstration in Pretoria, on February 15, 2025.

Why Trump Is Threatened by South Africa Why Trump Is Threatened by South Africa

The country’s Constitution gives its citizens more than a right to the pursuit of happiness. But attempts to redeem that commitment to justice have enraged American reactionaries....

Susan Neiman

Protesters hold a candlelight vigil demanding justice for drug war victims, after the arrest of former Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte, in Quezon City on March 11, 2025.

Rodrigo Duterte Used the Philippines’ US-Made Constitution Against Itself Rodrigo Duterte Used the Philippines’ US-Made Constitution Against Itself

The autocratic spectacle of Duterte’s presidency should be a warning to the United States.

Jill Damatac