The Breakdown: Are Antitrust Laws a Thing of the Past?

The Breakdown: Are Antitrust Laws a Thing of the Past?

The Breakdown: Are Antitrust Laws a Thing of the Past?

With AT&T’s announcement that it will buy T-Mobile, the wireless industry goes from four major carriers to three. Does anyone care about antitrust laws anymore?

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

With AT&T’s announcement that it will buy T-Mobile, the wireless industry goes from four major carriers to three. Does anyone care about antitrust and consumer protection laws anymore?

This past month AT&T announced plans to buy T-Mobile for $39 billion. The mega-merger will cut down the number of major wireless carriers from 4 to only 3, a consolidation of the market that doesn’t bode well for either those who rely on the industry for their livelihood or for customers. While cohorts of the wireless industry are urging Congress and the FCC not to use the merger as an excuse to create new regulations, others are beginning to wonder why even our existing antitrust and consumer protection laws don’t seem to apply anymore. On this week’s edition of The Breakdown, DC Editor Chris Hayes and journalist Barry C. Lynn track the historical trajectory of antitrust ideology in the US and discuss the legal antecedents and arguments that could be used to prevent further consolidation in major industries.

Further Reading:
Barry C. Lynn’s new book about the growing threat of monopoly capitalism, Cornered.
Barry C. Lynn and Phillip Longman on how monopolization is destroying jobs.
Annie Lowrey’s Slate article on why the AT&T merger is a bad idea.
Click here for a full transcript of this week’s episode of The Breakdown.

Subscribe to The Breakdown on iTunes to listen to fresh takes on the confusing concepts that make politics, economics and government tick. A new episode every week!

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x