Attack of the Cheneys

Attack of the Cheneys

Nation writer Matthew Duss discusses the neoconservative agenda in light of Liz Cheney’s constant attacks on the Obama Administration.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

In a piece for the Center for American Progress, Nation writer Matthew Duss argues that Liz Cheney’s defense of Bush administration policies–most notably the policies of her father, Dick Cheney–is an attempt to "rehabilitate the global war on terror" and "scare the American people into believing Osama Bin Laden is hiding under their bed."

Duss, who wrote the Nation cover piece this week "Attack of the Cheneys", discusses the latest arguments from neoconservatives, the future for neoconservatives, and Liz Cheney’s role. That role, he says, has a solid goal: to undermine the Obama administration. "They’re going after President Obama now, claiming that he’s not fighting the [Iraq] War as he should," Duss says. By establishing Keep America Safe with Bill Kristol, possibly as a way to jumpstart her political career, Liz Cheney has ensured that her neoconservative group will "continually" attack the Obama administration and further the neoconservative movement.

Ultimately, Duss says, the future of the neoconservatives will depend on the American people, who in 2008 voted for Barack Obama as a clear sideswipe to the neoconservative ideology. "It’s clear that Liz Cheney, Dick Cheney, Bill Kristol and other elements of the neoconservative faction are continuing to try to win this argument–this political argument–by scaring the American people, by making false arguments against the Obama administration," says Duss. "So the question is whether the American people will buy it."

Clarissa Leon

Check out more great Nation videos on our YouTube channel.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x