Paying to Party

Paying to Party

It’s no secret that the national conventions are no longer dramatic arenas in which the parties decide their presidential nominees or, for that matter, anything else of much importance.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

It’s no secret that the national conventions are no longer dramatic arenas in which the parties decide their presidential nominees or, for that matter, anything else of much importance. But that doesn’t mean the conventions are entirely substance-free–the real action just takes place outside the professionally produced spotlight, in VIP suites, on golf courses and at theme parties.

This year, the two conventions will cost at least $85 million ($50 million for the GOP; $35 million for the Democrats), the vast majority of which comes from corporate giants like AT&T, Microsoft and General Motors. Not coincidentally, all three are entangled in costly disputes with the Feds. Almost all of the other fifty-plus major contributors–including the telecommunications, healthcare, utilities, insurance, financial services, gas and aircraft and airline industries–have clear political interests with the federal government.

Both parties have planned events where corporate donors can mingle with party bigwigs. For example, the Republican National Committee is hosting a golf tournament at a posh Philadelphia country club for top contributors and GOP leaders; two weeks later, Democratic leaders will dine with elite donors at Paramount Studios in Los Angeles.

The corporations bankrolling the conventions say that “civic pride” motivates their six- and seven-figure donations. In reality, the conventions are a unique political and public-relations opportunity for Big Business. For example, BP Amoco, which is helping to fund the Democrats’ convention, has its logo plastered all over Los Angeles. Grateful convention-goers will receive phone services from SBC Communications and transportation courtesy of General Motors.

Federal law barred corporate funding of conventions until 1994, when the Federal Election Commission authorized unlimited tax-deductible contributions by donors, whose identities the parties can keep secret until months after the conventions. The result: Nobody yet knows exactly who has given how much for this year’s extravaganzas. The Democrats released a list placing top donors in broad categories; the Republicans disclosed a “partial list.” But neither side’s list shows the specifics of how the money is spent.

Individual legislators’ corporate-sponsored bashes, which are particularly popular among fat-cat donors and politicians, supplement the official $85 million tally. Legislators “are collected in one place, they are away from the daily barrage of routine business, and they are more relaxed than usual,” explains a brochure for a Mardi Gras party honoring Democratic Senator John Breaux. Sound illegal? Don’t worry: “Special exceptions to various ethics rules allow corporations to offer hospitality and stage events that otherwise might be prohibited or limited by state or federal codes,” the brochure promises.

In that spirit, Republican Congressman Billy Tauzin is hosting a party with generous funding from telecom behemoths BellSouth, Comsat and SBC Communications. What do they expect for their $25,000 contributions? A chance to chat with Tauzin, who chairs the Telecommunications, Trade and Consumer Protection Subcommittee. Tauzin isn’t alone. Fellow Republican Joe Barton, chairman of the Energy and Power Subcommittee, will attend a Texas-style barbecue that the American Gas Association, the Edison Electric Institute, the National Mining Association and the Nuclear Energy Institute are throwing for him. The same groups are hosting a party for Representative John Dingell, the Commerce Committee’s top Democrat. Sony, Disney, the Recording Industry Association of America, News Corporation and Seagram/Universal Studios are sponsoring a party for Republican Mark Foley, who chairs the GOP Task Force on Entertainment. And so on.

The national conventions used to be an integral component of American democracy. Now they’re just another channel through which corporations corrupt our political life.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x