The Activist Response

The Activist Response

When the FDA recently released its proposed new rules regarding genetically engineered foods Greenpeace and the Center for Food Safety didn’t like the taste.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

When the FDA recently released its proposed new rules regarding genetically engineered foods Greenpeace and the Center for Food Safety didn’t like the taste. Instead of requiring strict safety testing, the FDA rules compel producers merely to notify the agency 120 days before marketing a GE product. There is no requirement that manufacturers label GE foods. The FDA leaves that decision up to the producers. Now how many are going to note their foods were DNA-altered? Biotech champions, like Monsanto, maintain that genetically engineered foods are safe, but skeptics point to the recent fiasco with StarLink corn to support the argument that the public is at risk without government regulation. Doctors and scientists warn that GE foods could trigger allergies, and point to the recent case of a woman who suffered from anaphylactic shock after eating a taco shell containing the recalled StarLink corn. Today, most of the safety testing of GE products is conducted–if at all–by the corporations responsible for them. Greenpeace Genetic Engineering Specialist, Charles Margulis, maintains that without testing there is no way of knowing that GE foods are safe. Greenpeace and The Center for Food Safety are petitioning the FDA to change the rules, and through postcard and web campaigns hope to bring hundreds of thousands of complaints to the agency before April third when the public comment period on premarket notice ends. Concerned citizens can petition the FDA by visiting the Center for Food Safety’s website at www.centerforfoodsafety.org, or Greenpeace at www.greenpeaceusa.org.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x