In Fact…

In Fact…

KENNETH CLARK

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

KENNETH CLARK

“Racial considerations intruding upon the educational process contaminate education at the source,” Kenneth Clark wrote in these pages in 1979. As an African-American and the son of a trade-union shop steward, Clark believed in equality. As a psychologist, he believed in evidence. It was the combined commitment to evidence and equality that lent his studies on children of segregated schools such authority they became the basis for the Supreme Court’s Brown v. Board of Education decision. Until his death on May 1, just shy of Brown‘s fifty-first anniversary, Clark remained fiercely attached to those principles. By every measure he was able to define–children’s self-esteem, students’ performance on tests, flow of education dollars–separate-but-equal remained for Clark “a contradiction in terms for blacks,” even when expressed through such institutions as historically black colleges. His unwavering dedication to the core analysis of Brown led him to condemn, at various junctures, African-American separatism, Jewish racism, New York community school boards and liberal white intellectuals who “have lost all empathy with low-income people and black people.” Clark was as hard on his own early naïve optimism, and he understood that the courts, Justice Department and some black leaders long ago wrote off the Second Reconstruction promised by Brown. But he refused any intellectual accommodation with resegregation. Kenneth Clark was one of the country’s great truth-tellers.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x