On Hill and the Thomases: How Far Have We Come?

On Hill and the Thomases: How Far Have We Come?

On Hill and the Thomases: How Far Have We Come?

Anita Hill may not have stopped Clarence Thomas from being confirmed to the Supreme Court, but in the wake of her accusations, our culture changed. Or did it, really?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Virginia Thomas’s bizarre early-morning voice mail message to Anita Hill, suggesting she apologize for "what you did with my husband" nineteen years ago, brought the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings back in all their riveting, enraging glory.

Who could forget Long Dong Silver, the all-male judiciary committee that just "didn’t get it," Thomas’s famous charge that he was the victim of a "high-tech lynching for uppity blacks"?

Hill may not have stopped Thomas from being narrowly confirmed, 52–48, but she had other victories: she directly inspired the so-called Year of the Woman in 1992, which brought record numbers of women into Congress; and, although a New York Times/CBS poll found that only 24 percent believed Hill and 58 percent believed Thomas, her calm dignity in the face of boorish and dismissive questioning brought sexual harassment into the spotlight as it had never been before. As more and more women from all walks of life went public with their own painful and humiliating experiences, laws changed, business practices changed, and the culture changed too.

Or did it, really? After all, the upcoming election, also heralded as a Year of the Woman, features high-profile hard-right Republican women—to say nothing of Republican men—who are campaigning to turn back the clock on a range of women’s rights. Virginia Thomas herself is the founder and head of Liberty Central, a Tea Party–related activist group, and it’s tempting to wonder if her phone message was not an impulse call born of long-simmering grievance, and maybe an ill-timed martini as well, but a political move: dredging up Anita Hill, now a professor at Brandeis, to remind voters of the horrors of Democratic control and, especially, feminism.

In the broader culture, sexual insults to women are discussed more openly, but also uttered more brazenly. "Bitch" and "ho" are practically synonyms for "female"; sexist jeers at female politicians are the stock in trade of radio and TV hosts from Keith Olbermann on the left to Glenn Beck on the right. At Yale last week, pledges to the Delta Kappa Epsilon fraternity paraded around campus shouting "no means yes, yes means anal" and "I f – – – dead women." The Yale administration has yet to officially condemn this outrageous spectacle, and an editorial in the Yale Daily News chastised the university Women’s Center as "histrionic" for describing it as "an active call for sexual violence" rather than simply an immature, tasteless stunt by "members of our community" (unlike the feminists?). It’s a discouraging thought that the Dekes and the editorial writers are tomorrow’s employers—and maybe, the way things are going, tomorrow’s senators and Supreme Court justices, too.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x