Letters

Letters

Teachable moment; lizard brains’ll getcha every time; good deficits, bad deficits; industrial diet; the debates next time

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Teachable Moment

Chicago

Perhaps unconsciously motivated by a touch of riot envy, Steve Wasserman, in an otherwise informative review [“Exit Stage Left,” Oct. 29], mistakenly says that “the nation’s first teach-in, organized by the Vietnam Day Committee in May 1965,” was held on the Berkeley campus. The first Vietnam teach-in, organized by faculty and students of the University of Michigan, was held on the night of March 24,1965, on that campus. I oughta know.

MARSHALL SAHLINS

Professor Sahlins is the father of the teach-in. —The Editors


Lizard Brains’ll Getcha Every Time

Avalon, Calif.

Patricia J. Williams rang my chimes with her “Lizard Brains vs. the Land of the Real” column [Oct. 29]. As a childless, pre-TV adult who talks to cabbies and came to children’s books late in life as an aide in a K-12 school library in post-retirement (recently cut because of state budget deficits), I have been continually amazed by the wisdom emitted from the mouths of stuffed rabbits and assorted other creatures. I vote for a law that requires both houses of Congress to watch Sesame Street for an hour each week and participate in monthly outreach sessions with Big Bird. They would get a basic grounding in science and critical thinking, and our country would be better for it.

PATRICIA MOORE


Brooklyn, N.Y.

Patricia Williams writes that “thoughtful and critical response must uncover all the faulty structures of knowledge that sustain such belief systems,” referring in part to Georgia Representative Paul Broun Jr.’s statement, “All that stuff I was taught about evolution and embryology and the big bang theory, all that is lies straight from the pit of hell.” He also said, “I don’t believe that the earth’s but about 9,000 years old. I believe it was created in six days as we know them. That’s what the Bible says.”

It would take too long to deliver a thoughtful and critical response based on science, but let me point out some hypocrisy. The Bible also says: “Then they said, ‘Come, let us build ourselves a city, with a tower that reaches to the heavens’…. So the Lord scattered them from there over all the earth, and they stopped building the city” (Genesis 11:4–8) and “The highest heavens belong to the Lord, but the earth he has given to man” (Psalms 115:16).

Both strongly suggest that God intended man to stay put on earth. And yet Broun, addressing the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight regarding NASA, said, “I…hope that we can all work together to ensure that our nation’s space agency can securely support and appropriately protect cutting-edge research, collaborative science and mission operations.” Could Broun’s cafeteria-style Bible reading have anything to do with the aerospace industry, which is so important to Georgia’s economy?

ALBERT KAUFMAN


Good Deficits, Bad Deficits

Stanford, Calif.

Thank you for Sherle Schwenninger’s October 29 article, “The Missing Economic Debate.” It makes several points I have not seen elsewhere. In August 2010, when concern over federal deficits nearly caused a national default, I asked a Stanford colleague in the economics department, “Wasn’t it an early over-concern about deficits that prolonged the Depression?” To which he replied, “That was the double dip of 1937-38.” It was nice to see Schwenninger make that point.

I went on to ask my colleague, “To the extent that World War II ended the Depression, was it killing people that did that, or a willingness to run deficits at a level that was previously unthinkable?” The answer is obvious. Again, it was heartening to see Schwenninger note the difference between “bad deficits,” such as those from war, and “good deficits,” which in personal finance are usually called investments—infrastructure investments in the case of government.

One thing I would have liked to see is a comparison of how much “fake money” (as a percentage of GDP) was created in the Great Depression, previous recessions and the current Great Recession. I suspect that the current financial mess would be closer to the Great Depression than to previous recessions, which explains why it is taking so long to dig ourselves out, especially when over-concern for deficits is making the job harder.

MARTIN HELLMAN, professor emeritus of electrical engineering, Stanford University


Industrial Diet

Cabot, Vt.

Re “Michelle’s Moves” [Oct. 29], about Michelle Obama’s anti-obesity program: let’s not fool ourselves. The modern food industry is as dysfunctional, broken and destructive as the oil, pharmaceutical or chemical industry. As long as people, including many progressives, support this industry by consuming its food, the healthcare crisis and obesity will remain. (Let’s also take a lesson from the Dutch, who call their national healthcare insurance what it is: the sick fund.) A bright spot is the growing grassroots interest in wholesome, organic foods produced by small farmers and processors with a vision. A few centuries from now a plant-based diet will be the norm, and killing—in war as well as for food—will be something of the past.

SJON WELTERS


The Debates Next Time

Salem, Ore.

I commend Katha Pollitt for adeptly pointing out all the glaring omissions of vital topics from the presidential debates [“Debate This!” Oct. 29]. There was, however, one critical subject I was surprised to find missing from her list (as well as that of the moderators): campaign finance reform, including corporate personhood and the current sad state of American democracy. All her worthy debate topics would not be such burning issues one day if we could finally remove corporate money and influence from our political system. A government beholden to wealthy donors will never have the important debate subjects she listed as priorities.

RUSSELL RANEY


Saint Cloud, Fla.

My thanks to Katha Pollitt for her insight into the debates. All the frustration I felt, she perfectly put into words with her analysis of what I call the photo op they pass off as debate—four hours of speculative hype, followed by two hours of mini stump speeches, capped off by an hour of Monday morning quarterbacking. And they wonder why the voters are disgusted? Katha gets my vote to be a 2016 debate moderator.

JERRY MOBLEY

Independent journalism relies on your support


With a hostile incoming administration, a massive infrastructure of courts and judges waiting to turn “freedom of speech” into a nostalgic memory, and legacy newsrooms rapidly abandoning their responsibility to produce accurate, fact-based reporting, independent media has its work cut out for itself.

At The Nation, we’re steeling ourselves for an uphill battle as we fight to uphold truth, transparency, and intellectual freedom—and we can’t do it alone. 

This month, every gift The Nation receives through December 31 will be doubled, up to $75,000. If we hit the full match, we start 2025 with $150,000 in the bank to fund political commentary and analysis, deep-diving reporting, incisive media criticism, and the team that makes it all possible. 

As other news organizations muffle their dissent or soften their approach, The Nation remains dedicated to speaking truth to power, engaging in patriotic dissent, and empowering our readers to fight for justice and equality. As an independent publication, we’re not beholden to stakeholders, corporate investors, or government influence. Our allegiance is to facts and transparency, to honoring our abolitionist roots, to the principles of justice and equality—and to you, our readers. 

In the weeks and months ahead, the work of free and independent journalists will matter more than ever before. People will need access to accurate reporting, critical analysis, and deepened understanding of the issues they care about, from climate change and immigration to reproductive justice and political authoritarianism. 

By standing with The Nation now, you’re investing not just in independent journalism grounded in truth, but also in the possibilities that truth will create.

The possibility of a galvanized public. Of a more just society. Of meaningful change, and a more radical, liberated tomorrow.

In solidarity and in action,

The Editors, The Nation

Ad Policy
x