Clinton Urged to Quit Quick, And to Quiet the VP Chatter

Clinton Urged to Quit Quick, And to Quiet the VP Chatter

Clinton Urged to Quit Quick, And to Quiet the VP Chatter

Hillary Clinton is tenacious. Indeed, she is up-to-the-last-possible-moment tenacious.

But she is not politically suicidal.

And she certainly did not want to keep on campaigning for president until the titular leaders of the Democratic party – Democratic National Committee chair Howard Dean, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid – started screaming: “Enough!”

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Hillary Clinton is tenacious. Indeed, she is up-to-the-last-possible-moment tenacious.

But she is not politically suicidal.

And she certainly did not want to keep on campaigning for president until the titular leaders of the Democratic party – Democratic National Committee chair Howard Dean, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid – started screaming: “Enough!”

Since there was a very real possibility that Dean, Pelosi and Reid would have started screaming on this Sunday’s morning talk shows about the absurdity of continuing to campaign after the last primaries, when Barack Obama finally and formally secured enough pledged delegates and super-delegate endorsements to assure that he will be nominated at this summer’s Democratic National Convention in Denver, Clinton has decided to suspend her campaign on Saturday.

After Congressional Democrats made clear to Clinton in a telephone conversation that her time was up – continuing the campaign, said ticked-off New York Congressman Charlie Rangel, is “inconsistent with wanting a Democratic victory” — a chastened campaign communications director Howard Wolfson announced on behalf of the candidate that, “Senator Clinton will be hosting an event in Washington… to thank her supporters and express her support for Senator Obama and party unity.”

Clinton is expected to use the suspension tactic to maintain loose control over her delegates so that she will retain a measure of leverage going into platform debates and some influence over convention planning.

But even her most loyal supporters are saying that it is time for her to accept a supporting role in the 2008 campaign.

And they are not talking about the vice presidency.

While most seriously ridiculous backers – led by former White House aide Lanny Davis and Black Entertainment Television founder Robert Johnson – have launched petition drives designed to pressure Obama to select Clinton as his running mate, cooler heads in the Clinton camp are saying that it is time for the soon-to-be-former candidate and her more wide-eyed supporters that they had better back off.

“There’s no bargaining,” growled Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell, a former DNC chair and long-time Clinton backer, who explained to Davis, Johnson and other dead-enders in the Clinton camp: “You don’t bargain with the presidential nominee – even if you’re Hillary Clinton and you have 18 million votes, you don’t bargain.”

Rangel, Clinton’s fellow New Yorker and a key player in the process that made her a senator back in 2000, echoed Rendell’s sentiments.

“You don’t force a candidate,” said Rangel, “and you don’t put him in a position to look like he was forced.”

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x