United Socialist States of America

United Socialist States of America

Last night Stephen Colbert quite cleverly invited the actualSocialist candidate for President ontohis show, to give him the opportunity to state the blindinglyobvious: Obama’s no Socialist. (Added bonus was hearing a real, actualsocialist explain his philosophy on national television. That doesn’thappen very often)

The McCainFoxDrudge campaign’s decision to focus the last few weeks ofthe election on the combined spectre of redistribution and socialism(not, it should be noted, the same thing) is, I think, really dumb.

First, it’s not working. A new WallStreet Journal poll shows likely voters favor Obama over McCain ontax policy by 14 points. Part of that is no doubt due to Obama’s nearobsessive focus on hammering home his proposal for middle class taxcuts, but it also seems entirely possible that a broad majority ofAmericans think that “spreading the wealth” isn’t such a bad idea rightabout now.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Last night Stephen Colbert quite cleverly invited the actualSocialist candidate for President ontohis show, to give him the opportunity to state the blindinglyobvious: Obama’s no Socialist. (Added bonus was hearing a real, actualsocialist explain his philosophy on national television. That doesn’thappen very often)

The McCainFoxDrudge campaign’s decision to focus the last few weeks ofthe election on the combined spectre of redistribution and socialism(not, it should be noted, the same thing) is, I think, really dumb.

First, it’s not working. A new WallStreet Journal poll shows likely voters favor Obama over McCain ontax policy by 14 points. Part of that is no doubt due to Obama’s nearobsessive focus on hammering home his proposal for middle class taxcuts, but it also seems entirely possible that a broad majority ofAmericans think that “spreading the wealth” isn’t such a bad idea rightabout now.

Second, they’re creating a mandate that Obama didn’t formerly have. David Sirota put it this way:

[W]hile Obama has offered up a progressive-though-moderateagenda slightly to the left of Clinton-ish neoliberalism, McCain hasgone totally ideological. In doing that, he has polarized the argumentand turned the election into a referendum on the economic Darwinism ofthe conservative movement – a Darwinism that, as my column shows, hasbuilt a machine that confiscates middle-class wealth and sends it up the income ladder.

And Marc Ambinder recently noticed the same thing:

…it might be dangerous for the Republican Party to elevate the stakes for this election to a death match between competing ideologies. If Barack Obama’s victory is as decisive as it is shaping up to be, the Democrats can justifiably claim that conservatism itself has been rejected as a political and governing philosophy. In the closing weeks of the campaign, as the Republican ticket continues to run against the very idea of progressive politics, they are sowing the seeds of the post-election realignment narrative.

I think this is exactly right, and not just because I think it’stransparently moronic to argue that the difference between Capitalismand Socialism is the difference between a 35 percent top marginal tax rate and a 39.5 percent one. Obama himself, while he does weave in an ideological story into his main narrative, he tends, instead to offer himself as post-ideological and pragmatic. The Right, meanwhile, has turned this election into a referendum on Socialism.

And they’re going to lose. Amazing.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x