Our Low Turnout System

Our Low Turnout System

EMPORIA, VA – There are no lines to vote in this sleepy town and 80 miles south of Richmond, but that doesn’t mean turnout isn’t high. When I asked a poll worker at the local social services office polling location she said “Oh it’s very high, I can tell you that.” As word streams in from around the country of long lines to vote, particularly in polling locations that are usually as quiet and empty as a church on Wednesday, it strikes me that over several decades of low turnout contests (presidential elections strain to buck 50% turnout of eligible voters) our entire election system has now come to orient itself towards low-turnout elections. All of a sudden we’re finding out that if even two thirds of eligible voters decide to vote, and that would be high even for the estimates in this election, the system can’t handle it.

Seems like the default should be an election system that is designed for and can process every single person on the polls. If there’s spare capacity it doesn’t seem too high a cost to pay to make sure everyone gets a chance to exercise the franchise.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

EMPORIA, VA – There are no lines to vote in this sleepy town and 80 miles south of Richmond, but that doesn’t mean turnout isn’t high. When I asked a poll worker at the local social services office polling location she said “Oh it’s very high, I can tell you that.” As word streams in from around the country of long lines to vote, particularly in polling locations that are usually as quiet and empty as a church on Wednesday, it strikes me that over several decades of low turnout contests (presidential elections strain to buck 50% turnout of eligible voters) our entire election system has now come to orient itself towards low-turnout elections. All of a sudden we’re finding out that if even two thirds of eligible voters decide to vote, and that would be high even for the estimates in this election, the system can’t handle it.

Seems like the default should be an election system that is designed for and can process every single person on the polls. If there’s spare capacity it doesn’t seem too high a cost to pay to make sure everyone gets a chance to exercise the franchise.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x