A Step for Press Freedom in Russia?

A Step for Press Freedom in Russia?

As someone who has been close to Russia’s leading opposition newspaper “Novaya Gazeta” for many years, it’s a very important development that Russian President Dmitrii Medvedev gave his first print interview to that paper and its brave editor-in-chief Dmitrii Muratov. The interview, which took place a few days ago in the Kremlin and was published Wednesday, gives the paper much needed protection at a time when the economic and human rights situation in Russia is worsening. (Until now, the paper’s main protection derived from the fact that former Russian leader Mikhail Gorbachev is a part-owner.)

Not only is Medvedev’s interview an important step for “Novaya,” but it may also tell us something significant about Russia’s still-new President Medvedev. But for that we probably need to wait for more evidence.

The interview was not completely unexpected. When I was in Moscow last month, my husband Stephen Cohen and I spent an afternoon at the newspaper’s offices, talking to Muratov–a tenacious, spirited and brave editor–who we first met in a Moscow basement cafeteria in 1993.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

As someone who has been close to Russia’s leading opposition newspaper “Novaya Gazeta” for many years, it’s a very important development that Russian President Dmitrii Medvedev gave his first print interview to that paper and its brave editor-in-chief Dmitrii Muratov. The interview, which took place a few days ago in the Kremlin and was published Wednesday, gives the paper much needed protection at a time when the economic and human rights situation in Russia is worsening. (Until now, the paper’s main protection derived from the fact that former Russian leader Mikhail Gorbachev is a part-owner.)

Not only is Medvedev’s interview an important step for “Novaya,” but it may also tell us something significant about Russia’s still-new President Medvedev. But for that we probably need to wait for more evidence.

The interview was not completely unexpected. When I was in Moscow last month, my husband Stephen Cohen and I spent an afternoon at the newspaper’s offices, talking to Muratov–a tenacious, spirited and brave editor–who we first met in a Moscow basement cafeteria in 1993.

In our talks, he told us that the possibility of an interview with Medvedev had arisen in January, after the murder of yet another “Novaya” journalist by neo-Nazi extremists. A few days after the killing, Muratov and Gorbachev received an unexpected invitation to meet with Medvedev in the Kremlin. The President not only extended his sympathy to the paper and the journalist’s family–in distinct contrast to former President Putin’s words and actions after the assassination of “Novaya” reporter Anna Politkovskaya–but Medvedev also spoke of the importance of upholding laws to end neo-Nazi gang violence.

These were heartening words for Muratov–as was Medvedev’s talk of doing an interview with the newspaper after his return from the G-20 meetings. Also important was the President’s public statement that while he disagreed with the paper’s stance on most issues, he believed it was a “nuzhnaya gazeta.” (Translation–a needed newspaper.) For Muratov and his team, these words suggested a new level of protection for a paper which has published against great odds and paid a heavy price for its crusading investigations into high-level corruption, human rights violations, brutality in Chechnya and abuses of power. Several of its most courageous reporters –Igor Domnikov, Yuri Shchekochikhin and Anna Politkovskaya–have been murdered for their unflinching investigations.

So, for all who care about a free press, it’s worth paying attention to the Russian President’s decision to give his first print interview to a paper which has survived and thrived as an independent and oppositionist force.

And may Medvedev and the Russian government also work to see that the journalists’ killers be brought to justice.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x