War and Poverty in Afghanistan

War and Poverty in Afghanistan

President Obama has made the wrong decision to send 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan–at a cost of $1 million per soldier, or $30 billion a year. What we need is not more war but attention to problems like poverty which so often play a role in breeding insecurity and terrorism.

 

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

President Obama has made the wrong decision to send 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan–at a cost of $1 million per soldier, or $30 billion a year. What we need is not more war but attention to problems like poverty which so often play a role in breeding insecurity and terrorism.

In Afghanistan, as we dispatch these first soldiers, it’s important that we pay attention to the dire problem of extreme poverty in that tormented country.

The statistics are stunning: Afghanistan is the fifth least developed country in the world according to a UN report; the fifth lowest GDP per capita in the world at $426, according to the World Bank; life expectancy is 43 years compared to 59 for people in low-income countries worldwide; only 13 percent of Afghans have access to safe drinking water and 12 percent to adequate sanitation; 15,000 Afghan women die annually from pregnancy-related causes and the maternal mortality rate is second highest in the world; thirty Afghans die of tuberculosis every day; fewer than one in four Afghans are literate.

The counterinsurgency strategy itself calls for 80 percent of resources to be used for non-military purposes like economic development, and just 20 percent for the military. Yet both Presidents Bush and Obama have flipped this ratio, and with the new Obama surge, itseems the skewed allotment of resources will only get worse. (The Obama surge also contradicts counterinsurgency principles which demand twenty soldiers for every 1000 inhabitants, or 270,000-plus forces.)

Imagine what we might be able to accomplish to build security if we gave up on an outmoded "war" on terror and the hundreds of billions of dollars it squanders on military force, and instead funded sustainable development programs?

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x