When I was in my early 20s, I lost a union campaign for the first time. I was organizing carwasheros in New York City—workers who often labored for 70 hours a week, and sometimes more, in horrifically unsafe conditions for less than minimum wage. At this particular car wash, I hadn’t prepared the workers to build an organization capable of withstanding the immense fight their employer would put up against them. The workers were righteous and their boss was in violation of city, state, and federal laws. But it didn’t matter. The workers began crumbling under pressure, fighting with each other, breaking along the racial and national divisions their boss encouraged. Without strong enough organization, the workers stopped their campaign before an election ever took place. They had believed they could improve their lot collectively, and now they had been proven wrong. I had set them up for defeat, and I was crushed.
Shortly after things fell apart, I called Jane McAlevey, sobbing. She picked me up off the proverbial floor, and after we hung up, she sent me a text message that I still have saved on my phone: “Class struggle is not easy. It is, however, urgent and ongoing.”
It’s odd to talk about losing in a remembrance of Jane—after all, she usually won. But I think it matters, because part of what Jane taught is that winning is not inevitable, and neither is losing. Jane was obsessed with winning, and teaching others to win. She understood that losing is actually worse than keeping the status quo, that there is no moral value in being on the right side if you lose, that there is no romance in defeat. She taught us that if we do the work necessary to win, we will learn to win more. She took the successful methods that a long tradition of organizers has used for decades, and figured out how to systematically teach them to thousands of people around the world (another thing that Jane taught us: scale).
This spring, as Jane entered hospice, college students around the country bravely stood together and occupied their campuses to demand divestment from genocide. Watching them, I thought over and over about what Jane taught me: that good organizing breaks open our world. When we build unshakable unity and solidarity, we see ourselves and each other differently, capable of courage and power we could have never imagined before.
It’s easy to think that when the right time comes popular movements are inevitable. Jane’s life work was teaching us that there is no need—and no time—to wait around for the perfect moment to come. Through diligent work, we can create the moment. We can build solidarity and organization that takes us to the moment we need. Jane’s life work was coaching us in how to create the conditions necessary to win, so that we could feel the power of unity and come back for more.
Jane had an ability to hone in on power and strategy like no one else. She understood that we need to know who we are fighting, exactly how much power it will take to beat them, and how we will get there. For those of us who were lucky enough to work closely with her, she showed us what that looked like on a daily level. She taught me to always think: What am I doing right now to build power? What will I do tomorrow to build power? What will I do next week to build power?
A quick survey of the current state of our world—increasing inequality, unchecked corporate power, climate catastrophe, systematic racism, rising fascism, the list goes on—is enough to tell us that the moment we are in is urgent. The good news that Jane taught us is that between us, we have enough to win, if we organize well. Because Jane believed, more than anything, in the agency of ordinary people to take action and win. Jane taught that regular people can act together to change our lives. And that if we don’t, we’re screwed. No one is coming to save us, but us. Luckily, we can be enough.
A decade after experiencing a campaign falling apart, I’ve been fortunate to be part of many successful, world-opening fights, learning from Jane and many others—fights that fundamentally shifted the balance of power, fights that showed us how the world can be different, and how much more we can win. I don’t know that I will ever accept Jane being gone. I do know, though, that her words will continue to guide me forward. Class struggle is not easy. It is, however, urgent and ongoing.
Can we count on you?
In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.
We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.
Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.
Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.
Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation
