Ben Conroy, a PhD student from the University of Chicago who attended the 2024 march and who is part of an anti-abortion organization called the Minimise Project, said that the anti-abortion movement “can’t keep doing the same thing and expecting different results.”

“One thing I think the movement needs to reckon with–and has been insufficient in reckoning with–is the fact that we’ve lost all these referendums,” said Conroy. “I think Middle America is quite pro-choice. All we’ve been doing so far is not enough, we’re not changing people’s minds on this issue. I think the mainstream leaders of the movement are going to have to say, ‘We’re going to have to try something different.’ I think in that gap is a space for nontraditional pro-life groups to gain a greater foothold in the movement.”

Activists like Conroy think that—beyond ballot initiatives—lobbying for legislation on related issues is another potentially fruitful avenue of advocacy. He suggests that many young activists in the movement want to work on more specific issues relating to abortion and pregnancy in the United States, such as making birth free for all Americans, and that “working with people across the aisle should be a bigger part of the movement going forward.”

In this state-level approach, many of the mainstage speakers concerned themselves with another local cornerstone of their activism: crisis pregnancy centers, reproductive care clinics that do not offer abortion services and which are known for discouraging patients from obtaining abortions, often using misinformation and delay tactics. Speakers like Representative Johnson, for example, touted a House bill that would block a federal rule preventing states from using Temporary Assistance for Needy Families—a federal welfare program—to fund crisis pregnancy centers.

Uniting around a more localized approach—with state legislation and support for crisis pregnancy centers at the forefront—meant national concerns often took the backseat.

Republican politicians recently made headlines for backing away from calls for a national abortion ban, instead talking in terms of “limits.” While the 2020 March for Life welcomed former President Donald Trump as a speaker, the 2024 March for Life featured no official candidates and largely shied away from talk of a national ban altogether, grounding itself firmly in working toward local legislation in battleground states.

But the upcoming presidential election remained on the minds of student anti-abortion activists. Students at the march suggested a general dissatisfaction with the current candidates, lamenting the Republican Party’s backing away from a strict anti-abortion stance.

“Personally, I would never be able to vote for a politician who didn’t value life above all else,” said Kenzi Bustamante, president of the Students for Life chapter at the University of Chicago. “And if they are celebrating abortion as is common now, that attitude gives me a lack of hope for other issues I might care about. I feel like abortion is the starting place for gauging whether people value life.”

Some activists, like Chris, a member of Students for Life Colorado, said they are focused on action, but are not hopeful about the results of the 2024 election. “We have to go by the actions the politicians take,” said Chris. “Trump got Amy Coney Barrett into the Supreme Court, and without her, Roe wouldn’t have been overturned. I think a real pro-life candidate is what this country needs, but I don’t think it’s possible in the next election. I think Trump admits openly and publicly that he is not pro-life.”

Amid the talk of state-level legislation and crisis pregnancy centers, onlookers and participants’ voices were drowned out by prayer. Johnson couched his speech in religious terms. Speaking of the inalienable rights to life and liberty, Johnson emphasized that “our rights do not come from government, our rights come from God, our creator.”

As Johnson spoke, Conroy told me how important he thinks it is for the anti-abortion movement to focus on nonreligious arguments against abortion in order to cast as wide a net as possible. “The very explicitly religious tone of some of the stuff at the March for Life has a place, but as the major key, I think a lot of these new pro-life organizations would want to see a move toward more secular arguments being the baseline,” said Conroy. “If we’re serious about this being a human rights issue, then it’s essential to build as broad a coalition as possible.”

Aimee Murphy, who grew up in a liberal household in California and who decided she was against abortion as a teenager, founded Rehumanize International, an anti-abortion organization that follows the “consistent life ethic” and opposes euthanasia, the death penalty and police brutality. They are a nonpartisan and nonreligious nonprofit, like the Consistent Life Network, the Equal Rights Institute, and Progressive Anti-Abortion Uprising, groups that did not make the main stage but that did speak at some of the anti-abortion conferences that were held in D.C. the weekend of the march. Rehumanize is also active in political advocacy, and recently came under fire for its executive director being implicated in a major abortion trial in which several anti-abortion protesters blockaded and intercepted patients at an abortion clinic.

“I had applied for jobs with mainstream social justice organizations and mainstream pro-life organizations, and I didn’t really feel like I fit into either sphere completely,” said Murphy. “I wanted there to be a space where I would have felt welcome as 16-year-old me when I became pro-life. I was and am queer. I was an atheist. I was and am still quite liberal and left-leaning. I didn’t feel at home in this very right-wing, conservative pro-life movement.’”

She hopes organizations like hers can push for bipartisan legislation that would expand healthcare access and provide greater financial support to families. She suggests that the contemporary anti-abortion movement will have to look more broadly and make alliances with organizations and politicians with whom they do not fully see eye-to-eye. “Even if pro-life and pro-social safety net have seemed at odds, I hope that politicians will hear us, that one of the biggest ways we can combat abortion is resourcing families to prevent people from thinking that it’s their only option,” says Murphy. “With the millennial and the Gen Z experience, more people than ever are identifying as LGBT, nonpartisan, no affiliation even religiously, I think we realize—if this cause really is for everyone—we need to be inclusive,” said Murphy.

While marching across the National Mall among throngs of student groups, Bustamante looked on with disappointment at groups of young people holding signs that read, “Make More Babies.” The signs were part of an advertising campaign for the anti-abortion baby supply company Every Life, which has attempted to capitalize on other diaper brands like Pampers and Huggies funding abortion travel for its employees.

“There’s some people who are less developed in their philosophy, who don’t fully understand the core of it, which is that life begins at conception, that human rights are inalienable from the moment of conception,” said Bustamante. “So they might misconstrue that or focus too much on the ‘make more babies’ part, find it funny, not take it seriously as it should be.”

The march was inundated with these kinds of messaging conflicts, with participants still elated with Dobbs, but coming to terms with political losses at the state level and preparing their strategy for the future: a wide-reaching amalgamation of state-level anti-abortion legislation, the dropping of calls for a federal abortion ban, and uplifting the work of crisis pregnancy centers. Anti-abortion activists still believe mobilizing young people is key, but just how they will do so remains unclear. Referencing the recent defeats of the anti-abortion movement at the ballot box, Conroy remarked that “nothing wakes you up like failure.”