Abbas, the UN and the Futility of Armed ‘Resistance’

Abbas, the UN and the Futility of Armed ‘Resistance’

Abbas, the UN and the Futility of Armed ‘Resistance’

With today’s vote in the UN General Assembly, Palestine will take a significant step toward statehood.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Let’s be honest: “resistance” to Israel by the Palestinians is idiotic.

By resistance, of course, I mean armed resistance, armed intifadas, shooting aimless missiles into Israeli territory, and outlier actions like the bus bombing that recently occurred in Tel Aviv. A general strike, other nonviolent actions and other sorts of peaceful resistance are fine, and in fact vital.

I get it, that for Palestinians living in near-hopeless conditions, oppressed by an unending Israeli occupation led by a regime in Israel that seems intent on expanding settlements and grabbing all the land it can hold onto, violence might seem like the answer.

But the answer is a two-state solution, negotiated between Israel and Palestine, under the auspices of the United Nations—and, naturally, with the United States using all of its muscle and influence to get Israel to go along.

That’s why the vote today at the United Nations on Palestinian “statehood” is important.

Is it impossible that a major reason behind Israel’s assault on Gaza this month was because Israel wanted to distract from and undermine President Abbas’s diplomacy at the UN? I don’t think so. By bludgeoning Gaza so brutally, Israel strengthened Hamas and eclipsed Abbas’ Palestinian Authority. For decades, Israel’s far right has thrived on emasculating and undermining moderate Palestinians and building up radical groups, including Hamas, thus creating the self-fulfilling prophecy that there is no “partner” to negotiate with. Hardline Israelis, led by Prime Minister Netanyahu, are like tuning forks that resonate with Hamas’s extremist views.

The real threat to Israel is not Hamas’s missiles, but growing world pressure on Israel to strike a deal along the lines of the Oslo Accords.

That’s why, when it became clear that Abbas and the PA were going to the UN, Israel threatened to retaliate by canceling Oslo, dissolving the PA and getting rid of Abbas. Now that most of Europe has agreed to support the PA initiative at the UN today, Israel is backing off its radical threats. Still, it’s clear that Israel fears the PA move, in particular the idea that Abbas might use his newfound UN status to call for an investigation of Israel’s criminal policies in the occupied territories, especially the West Bank, by the International Criminal Court.

Israel is well aware that its cruel policies toward the Palestinians push them toward Hamas and toward “resistance.” But violence is not only futile. It’s counterproductive.

Bolstered by its macho status following the Israeli assault on Gaza, Hamas is talking tough. But there are hopeful signs that Hamas might be willing—under pressure from Egypt—to rejoin the PLO and the PA. By so doing, for all its macho talk about “resistance,” Hamas will take a step toward recognizing the legitimacy of the Israeli state and entering into two-state talks.

While the UN votes on Palestinian statehood in New York, families in Gaza are still suffering from the trauma of recent bombings. Check out Sharif Abdel Kouddous’s dispatch from Gaza after the ceasefire. 

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x