Inmate Dies of Heart Attack After Botched Execution, Oklahoma Postpones Another

Inmate Dies of Heart Attack After Botched Execution, Oklahoma Postpones Another

Inmate Dies of Heart Attack After Botched Execution, Oklahoma Postpones Another

Clayton D. Lockett reacted “violently” to an untested combination of drugs Tuesday before succumbing to a heart attack.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

An Oklahoma inmate died of a heart attack Tuesday shortly after a botched execution using an untested combination of lethal injection drugs caused him to writhe and gasp, leading officials to postpone a second execution scheduled for the night.

Clayton D. Lockett, 38, reacted “violently” to the drugs after he was already declared unconscious, “kicking and grimacing” before officials lowered the chamber’s viewing room blinds and halted the execution, according to Tulsa World reporter Ziva Branstetter, who witnessed the process. Lockett was pronounced dead at 7:06 pm of a heart attack, forty-three minutes after the execution began.

“His body started to twitch, he mumbled something I couldn’t understand,” Dean Sanderford, an attorney representing Lockett, told CNN. “The convulsing got worse, it looked like his whole upper body was trying to lift off the gurney. For a minute, there was chaos.”

“His vein exploded,” said Oklahoma Department of Corrections Director Robert Patton, in a statement to reporters. Patton explained that it could not be determined how much of the drugs in the three-drug procedure made it into Lockett’s body. The combination had never before been used in an Oklahoma execution.

Republican Governor Mary Fallin ordered a fourteen-day stay of execution for Charles Warner, another condemned man who was scheduled to die at 8 pm Tuesday. She also called for a review of Oklahoma’s execution procedures “to determine what happened and why during this evening’s execution of Clayton Derrell Lockett.”

Lockett’s botched execution will surely intensify the nationwide debate over death penalty procedures, as states turn to poorly regulated compounding pharmacies to restock dwindling supplies of lethal injection drugs. Attorneys and advocates have warned for months that using drugs from unverified sources could cause inmates to experience cruel and unusual pain during executions. Earlier this year, an Ohio inmate gasped and snorted during a fifteen-minute execution process using an untested drug cocktail, while another Oklahoma inmate declared, “I can feel my whole body burning.”

Oklahoma is one of several states with statutes protecting the anonymity of lethal drug suppliers. Lockett and Warner had both filed appeals to compel the state to reveal its drug source. The state’s Supreme Court granted an indefinite stay of execution last Monday for the two condemned men, pending review of the law. The next day, Governor Fallin issued an executive order saying the state would defy the high court’s ruling and proceed with the executions anyway. And the day after, the state Supreme Court declared the secrecy statute constitutional, overturning a district court ruling, and lifted the stay execution it had granted just two days prior.

“After weeks of Oklahoma refusing to disclose basic information about the drugs for tonight’s lethal injection procedures, tonight, Clayton Lockett was tortured to death,” said Madeline Cohen, a federal public defender representing Charles Warner. “Until much more is known about tonight’s failed experiment of an execution, no execution can be permitted in Oklahoma.”

Cohen and other attorneys have called for a third-party investigation of Lockett’s death.

“In Oklahoma’s haste to conduct a science experiment on two men behind a veil of secrecy, our state has disgraced itself before the nation and the world,” said Ryan Kiesel, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma, in a statement.

 

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x