Anonymous Detentions Ruled Legal

Anonymous Detentions Ruled Legal

“Citizens have a compelling interest in ensuring that their government does not abuse one of its most awesome powers, the power to arrest and jail.”

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

On June 17 a panel of the US Court of Appeals in Washington ruled 2 to 1 to allow the Justice Department to keep secret the names of hundreds of foreigners detained–sometimes for months–by federal authorities after the September 11 attacks. Last August a federal judge ruled in favor of a Freedom of Information lawsuit requesting the names, filed by the Center for National Security Studies, The Nation and other public interest groups. And in early June the Justice Department’s Inspector General released a highly critical report noting that the detentions had been plagued with “significant problems,” including possible abuse of the detainees. The appeals court majority, however, said that federal judges should defer to the Administration’s argument that revealing the detainees’ identities might compromise national security. In a blistering dissent, Judge David Tatel wrote, “Just as the government has a compelling interest in ensuring citizens’ safety, so do citizens have a compelling interest in ensuring that their government does not…abuse one of its most awesome powers, the power to arrest and jail.” The Center plans to pursue the case.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x