‘Bloody Sunday’ Apologies, What About Monday?

‘Bloody Sunday’ Apologies, What About Monday?

‘Bloody Sunday’ Apologies, What About Monday?

David Cameron apologized for the killings of "Bloody Sunday" after 38 years. How long will it take for an apology for other state killings? 

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Yesterday, a prominent world leader made an official apology to his nation.

"What happened…was both unjustified and unjustifiable. It was wrong. The Government is ultimately responsible for the conduct of the armed forces. And for that, on behalf of the Government, indeed on behalf of our country, I am deeply sorry."

Unfortunately, that wasn’t Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu, talking about the deaths on the Freedom Flotilla, or any US president. Instead, it was David Cameron, new British prime minister, apologizing for the actions of the British army in 1972, on what has become known as "Bloody Sunday."

Soldiers killed fourteen men that day when they opened fire on a peaceful civil rights protest — and for 38 years, the government has blamed the protesters—accusing those marching for jobs and homes and the vote, and against internment without trial—of attacking the Empire’s crack-troops. Sound familiar?

The Saville inquiry into the Bloody Sunday killings finally righted the wrong of the original inquiry, which blamed the victims and their families for their own deaths—and from which the media took their cues, as they so often do.

Robert Fisk who was a Northern Ireland reporter for many years, wrote this week that, "As usual—and for Derry, read Fallujah or Gaza or any Afghan village where civilians get in the way—the innocent became the guilty and the guilty became the innocent."

Now Israel is planning its own inquiry into the deaths on board the Mavi Marmara, but calls for a truly independent commission have been brushed off by Netanyahu. General Rick Sanchez has been calling for a truth commission into US human rights crimes for a year. Will justice again take thirty-eight years?

Support us by signing up for our podcast, and follow GRITtv or GRITlaura on Twitter.com.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x