The Breakdown: In an Age of Austerity, Can’t the US Cut the Military Budget?

The Breakdown: In an Age of Austerity, Can’t the US Cut the Military Budget?

The Breakdown: In an Age of Austerity, Can’t the US Cut the Military Budget?

The US maintains the most expansive and expensive military on the planet. On this week’s edition of The Breakdown, D.C. Editor Chris Hayes and Institute for Policy Studies Research Fellow Miriam Pemberton discuss just how much the US could afford to cut Pentagon spending while maintaining its status as the dominant military force in the world.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

The US maintains the most expansive and expensive military on the planet. On this week’s edition of The Breakdown, D.C. Editor Chris Hayes and Institute for Policy Studies Research Fellow Miriam Pemberton discuss just how much the U.S. could afford to cut Pentagon spending while maintaining its status as the dominant military force in the world.

The US maintains the most expansive and expensive military on the planet.  More than half of the annual budget goes towards “defense.”  But in the ongoing debates about the appropriate austerity measures to take, cuts to military spending have been insufficiently prioritized.  On this week’s edition of The Breakdown, D.C. Editor Chris Hayes and Institute for Policy Studies Research Fellow Miriam Pemberton discuss just how much the US could afford to cut Pentagon spending while maintaining its status as the dominant military force in the world.

Resources

Miriam Pemberton on the misleading nature of military spending “cuts”:
Center for American Progress article on reducing military spending:
Robert Dreyfuss discussing the “civil war” in the GOP over demilitarization:
Barney Frank on cutting NATO spending: “It Serves No Strategic Purpose”
The Independent’s Robert Fisk discusses the costs of war in the Middle East:

Subscribe to The Breakdown on iTunes to listen to fresh takes on the confusing concepts that make politics, economics and government tick. A new episode every week!

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x