The Breakdown: Is the Federal Deficit Actually Bad for Our Economy?

The Breakdown: Is the Federal Deficit Actually Bad for Our Economy?

The Breakdown: Is the Federal Deficit Actually Bad for Our Economy?

Would getting rid of the federal deficit be the silver bullet for our ailing economy? Robert Pollin explains why the standard arguments against deficit spending don’t tell the whole truth.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Why, exactly, is the federal government deficit a bad thing? We’ve all heard the numerous objections: the deficit increases interest burdens, contributes to currency inflation and leaves us in debt to foreign states and investors. But why has deficit spending, as we’re told, suddenly reached “crisis” level? On this week’s edition of The Breakdown, DC Editor Chris Hayes and economist Robert Pollin talk about why the standard arguments against deficit spending don’t tell the whole truth, and why our economy is unhealthy for reasons other than simple debt accumulation.

Why, exactly, is the federal government deficit a bad thing? We’ve all heard the numerous objections: the deficit increases interest burdens, contributes to currency inflation and leaves us in debt to foreign states and investors. But why has deficit spending, as we’re told, suddenly reached “crisis” level? On this week’s edition of The Breakdown, DC Editor Chris Hayes and economist Robert Pollin discuss why the standard arguments against deficit spending don’t tell the whole truth, and why our economy is unhealthy for reasons other than simple debt accumulation.

Resources

Robert Pollin in The Boston Review on the moral imperative of full employment.
Pollin explains why austerity is not a solution [PDF].
Robert Pollin and Jeffrey Thompson on the betrayal of public workers in this week’s issue of The Nation.

Subscribe to The Breakdown on iTunes to listen to fresh takes on the confusing concepts that make politics, economics and government tick. A new episode every week!

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x