The Breakdown: The Great Climate Debate

The Breakdown: The Great Climate Debate

The Breakdown: The Great Climate Debate

Global warming is not just controversial, it’s also pretty confusing. As world leaders debate in Copenhagen, politicians in Congress are pushing different plans to deal with climate change. Christopher Hayes breaks down the difference between cap and trade and a carbon tax.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket
The Breakdown

Krugman vs. Hansen! Lieberman vs. Collins! Cap and trade vs. carbon tax! Global warming is not just controversial, it’s also pretty confusing. As world leaders squabble in Copenhagen, politicians in Congress are pushing different plans to deal with climate change. To help make sense of the debate, The Nation‘s Washington, D.C. Editor Christopher Hayes breaks down the difference between a cap and trade plan and a carbon tax.

Related Links

James Hansen, Storms of My Grandchildren

James Hansen, Cap and Fade

Paul Krugman, The Unhelpful Hansen

David Roberts, What to Make of the Cantwell/Collins CLEAR Act

N. Gregory Mankiw, A Missed Opportunity on Climate Change

Note: This is the beta launch of a new audio feature from The Nation, "The Breakdown with Christopher Hayes." Each week we’ll take questions from readers about confusing terms you’re hearing in the news, and then we’ll choose one to demystify! This is also the beta launch of our new audio player. We welcome and encourage your feedback about the new feature and the audio player. Please send comments to radionation [at] thenation [dot] com. If you would like to submit a question for the first 2010 edition of "The Breakdown," tweet Christopher Hayes, @chrislhayes, or email thebreakdown [at] thenation [dot] com.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x