The Breakdown: Why Are Public Pensions ‘Unfunded’?

The Breakdown: Why Are Public Pensions ‘Unfunded’?

The Breakdown: Why Are Public Pensions ‘Unfunded’?

In their assault on public sector workers, Republicans continue to point to so-called “unfunded” pension programs as a symbol of broken government. But how did the pensions become unfunded in the first place?

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

As Republicans escalate their assault on the benefits and livelihoods of public sector workers, they continue to point to so-called “unfunded” pension programs as a symbol of broken government. But how did these pensions become “unfunded” in the first place? Christopher Hayes and Dean Baker explain.

As Republicans escalate their assault on the benefits and livelihoods of public sector workers, they continue to point to so-called “unfunded” pension programs as a symbol of broken government. But in what way exactly are these pensions “unfunded,” and why has the mainstream media done such a poor job explaining how they came to be unfunded? Are all state pension programs unfunded? Whose idea was it to make them unfunded, Republicans, Democrats or state politicians generally? And finally, are there any state pension programs, unfunded or otherwise, that are not facing a fiscal crisis? In this week’s episode of The Breakdown, DC Editor Christopher Hayes and economist Dean Baker discuss how public pension funds function and whether or not they’re really a main factor in state budget shortfalls.

Further Reading:

Dean Baker explaining Public Pensions 101.
Dean Baker on the origins and severity of the public pension crisis [PDF].
David Cay Johnston talks about why reporting in Wisconsin on public pensions has been so bad.

Subscribe to The Breakdown on iTunes to listen to fresh takes on the confusing concepts that make politics, economics and government tick. A new episode every week!

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x