The Breakdown: Why Are Public Pensions ‘Unfunded’?

The Breakdown: Why Are Public Pensions ‘Unfunded’?

The Breakdown: Why Are Public Pensions ‘Unfunded’?

In their assault on public sector workers, Republicans continue to point to so-called “unfunded” pension programs as a symbol of broken government. But how did the pensions become unfunded in the first place?

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

As Republicans escalate their assault on the benefits and livelihoods of public sector workers, they continue to point to so-called “unfunded” pension programs as a symbol of broken government. But how did these pensions become “unfunded” in the first place? Christopher Hayes and Dean Baker explain.

As Republicans escalate their assault on the benefits and livelihoods of public sector workers, they continue to point to so-called “unfunded” pension programs as a symbol of broken government. But in what way exactly are these pensions “unfunded,” and why has the mainstream media done such a poor job explaining how they came to be unfunded? Are all state pension programs unfunded? Whose idea was it to make them unfunded, Republicans, Democrats or state politicians generally? And finally, are there any state pension programs, unfunded or otherwise, that are not facing a fiscal crisis? In this week’s episode of The Breakdown, DC Editor Christopher Hayes and economist Dean Baker discuss how public pension funds function and whether or not they’re really a main factor in state budget shortfalls.

Further Reading:

Dean Baker explaining Public Pensions 101.
Dean Baker on the origins and severity of the public pension crisis [PDF].
David Cay Johnston talks about why reporting in Wisconsin on public pensions has been so bad.

Subscribe to The Breakdown on iTunes to listen to fresh takes on the confusing concepts that make politics, economics and government tick. A new episode every week!

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x