The Breakdown: Will Torture Memo Authors Evade Justice?

The Breakdown: Will Torture Memo Authors Evade Justice?

The Breakdown: Will Torture Memo Authors Evade Justice?

In 2002, the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel, at the behest of the CIA and in conjunction with the White House, drafted a memo on acceptable standards of interrogation. Now the authors have been cleared of wrongdoing.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket
The Breakdown

In 2002, the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel, at the behest of the CIA and in conjunction with the White House, drafted a memo on acceptable standards of interrogation. The OLC’s opinions, authored by then-Deputy Assistant Attorney General John Yoo and approved by his supervisor Jay Bybee, provided a legal framework for the widespread implementation of cruel and inhuman enhanced interrogation techniques used under the Bush Administration. Since the memo’s public release, human rights organizations, independent legal bodies and intelligence officials have all condemned the document and demanded professional sanctions for Yoo and Bybee. After five years of investigation, the Office of Professional Responsibility recently released a report effectively clearing Yoo and Bybee of misconduct. On this week’s The Breakdown, The Nation‘s DC Editor Christopher Hayes, with guest Marcy Wheeler from Firedoglake, discuss the layers of the OPR report and its implications.

Related Links

Marcy Wheeler’s blog, Empty Wheel.

Official text of the Bybee memo.

Documents from the Department of Justice relating to the OPR report.

Foreign Policy brief on OPR findings.

Editor’s Note: Starting this week, The Breakdown is being produced in partnership with ExplainThis.org, a new website devoted to explanatory journalism. Visitors to the site can post questions, which are sorted and ranked, and then answered by journalists. ExplainThis.org has set up a special page for The Breakdown, so you can now ask Christopher Hayes your questions via email, twitter or online–at ExplainThis.org/thebreakdown.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x