Britain and Greece: Democracy vs. the Markets

Britain and Greece: Democracy vs. the Markets

Britain and Greece: Democracy vs. the Markets

Protesters in London are calling on Nick Clegg to hold out for electoral reform, but both in Britain and in Greece "the markets" are squeezing democracy.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Two days after Britain’s inconclusive election, a thousand or so protesters dressed in suffrage purple have gathered outside the building in London where Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg is meeting with his MPs to discuss his response to the blandishments of the two major parties, both wooing him to support their claim to power. They’re chanting “Fair Votes Now,” “My Vote Counts,” “You Serve Us,” and “We Want Nick” to stiffen his spine against any deal he might make that doesn’t guarantee electoral reform. I’m watching it on TV as I write, and Clegg has just come out to address  the crowd. He’s saying he genuinely believes it is in the national interest to use this opportunity to usher in a new politics, thanking them for their campaign, urging them to take it to every street and every town in Britain. They are cheering wildly. Cleggmania may have fizzled in the voting booth, but it seems to have sparked a different kind of flame. It looks like Britain now has a democracy movement.

This is a very British protest, a million miles from the demonstrations in Greece last week, in which three bank workers died when a petrol bomb was thrown into their building. But they’re connected. In Greece, a democratically elected socialist government has been forced by the EU and the IMF to impose intolerable austerity measures because “the markets” have speculated wildly on its debt. In Britain, “the markets” are putting pressure on the politicians to reach a fast resolution to the uncertainty the election has produced—which means, as the  Financial Times opines, “a deal between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats.”  On Thursday night, the BBC paused at regular intervals in its election coverage to take sterling’s temperature. It was as if, as Princess Diana once said, there were three parties to this marriage: the voters, the candidates, and "the markets," a "jittery" beast that must be constantly "reassured" lest it should turn on us and tear us all to shreds. “The markets,” says BBC business correspondent Robert Peston, want “a stable government perceived to be tackling the public-sector deficit in a serious, substantial way”—code for Cameron in Downing Street with a solid majority, however he can cobble it together. The media—and David Cameron—have repeatedly threatened that Britain might “turn into Greece.”

Of course, there’s nothing new about this kind of pressure—except, perhaps, how openly it is now brought to bear. Hanging over this weekend’s negotiations in London is the memory of the 1970s, where a series of hung parliaments and minority governments led to a sterling crisis and the ignominious arrival of the IMF—which led to Margaret Thatcher’s election in 1979. More power to the purple people gathered now in London. They may find that they’ve taken on more than they bargained for.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x