Bush’s Credibility Gap

Bush’s Credibility Gap

In response to the news that coordinated suicide bombs in Baghdad had killed several dozen people and wounded 200, George W. Bush pointed to the attacks as a sign of success.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

In response to the news that coordinated suicide bombs in Baghdad had killed several dozen people and wounded 200, George W. Bush pointed to the attacks as a sign of success. “There are terrorists in Iraq who are willing to kill anybody in order to stop our progress,” he told White House reporters. “The more successful we are on the ground, the more these killers will react.” A glib response might be, Then let’s hope for a little less success. More serious–much more serious–is that Bush is contributing to a growing credibility gap. As Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld noted in his famously leaked memo, “Today, we lack the metrics to know if we are winning or losing the global war on terror.” But that has not prevented the President from proclaiming that he’s “rolling back the terrorist threat.”

From the beginning, Bush has not been straight with the public–not just about the reasons for war and occupation but about the challenges and the reality on the ground. As Bush was hailing “progress” in Iraq, Doctors Without Borders and the Red Cross were cutting staff in Iraq because of the increase in violence. And when a reporter asked Bush, “What do you know about who is behind these attacks?” he replied with a specious syllogism: “The best way to describe the people who are conducting these attacks are cold-blooded killers, terrorists. That’s all they are. They’re terrorists.” Another reporter inquired whether the security problems in Iraq were impeding the hunt for weapons of mass destruction. Bush replied, “Again, I will repeat myself, that the more progress we make on the ground…the more desperate these killers become.” He did not refer to the supposed ongoing search for the weapons of mass destruction he once claimed were there.

Comparing Iraq to Vietnam, though tempting, is not always a useful analogy. But GOP Senator John McCain has noted a similarity that is instructive: The Administration is dishing out explanations and spin that are out of sync with the situation. As America figures out how to handle the massive task Bush has created for it in Iraq, the last thing we need is a credibility gap. But that’s what Bush offers the troops, who are in danger, and the American people, who must bear the mounting costs of Bush’s war.

Support independent journalism that exposes oligarchs and profiteers


Donald Trump’s cruel and chaotic second term is just getting started. In his first month back in office, Trump and his lackey Elon Musk (or is it the other way around?) have proven that nothing is safe from sacrifice at the altar of unchecked power and riches.

Only robust independent journalism can cut through the noise and offer clear-eyed reporting and analysis based on principle and conscience. That’s what The Nation has done for 160 years and that’s what we’re doing now.

Our independent journalism doesn’t allow injustice to go unnoticed or unchallenged—nor will we abandon hope for a better world. Our writers, editors, and fact-checkers are working relentlessly to keep you informed and empowered when so much of the media fails to do so out of credulity, fear, or fealty.

The Nation has seen unprecedented times before. We draw strength and guidance from our history of principled progressive journalism in times of crisis, and we are committed to continuing this legacy today.

We’re aiming to raise $25,000 during our Spring Fundraising Campaign to ensure that we have the resources to expose the oligarchs and profiteers attempting to loot our republic. Stand for bold independent journalism and donate to support The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel

Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x