Charges in Police Killings Just a Start

Charges in Police Killings Just a Start

Charges in Police Killings Just a Start

If a federal investigation’s good enough for New Orleans, how about Oakland too?

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

So you wonder about government. What’s it for? Why do we need it?

A story out of New Orleans puts those questions in sharp relief: Nearly five years after Hurricane Katrina, four current and two former New Orleans police officers have been charged by the Department of Justice with federal civil rights violations (and could face the death penalty) for the shooting and killing of James Brissette and Ronald Madison, two unarmed African Americans, in the aftermath of the storm.

In the immediate wake of the killings, the New Orleans police dreamt up a story about being shot at. A cover up followed that included manufactured witnesses, a planted weapon, a fake police report and lying to a state grand jury.

Murder charges brought by the New Orleans Parish DA were dismissed by a judge in 2008.

It’s taken Attorney General Eric Holder to reverse course. Now Holder’s saying the charges against the six are only a start. What’s needed is reform. In the wake of the involuntary manslaughter charges against Johannes Mehserle for the shooting of Oscar Grant in Oakland, it is good to hear that the Obama justice department is involved in a full review of the New Orleans police department. But why five years later? And why stop there?

If a federal investigation’s good enough for New Orleans, how about Oakland too?

The F Word is a regular commentary by Laura Flanders, the host of GRITtv which broadcasts weekdays on satellite TV (Dish Network Ch. 9415 Free Speech TV) on cable, and online at GRITtv.org and TheNation.com. Support us by signing up for our podcast, and follow GRITtv or GRITlaura on Twitter.com.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x