Charlie Rose’s FAIR Take on the Deficit Debate

Charlie Rose’s FAIR Take on the Deficit Debate

Charlie Rose’s FAIR Take on the Deficit Debate

Pressed by Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, Charlie Rose finally offers the other side of the deficit debate — featuring truth tellers Dean Baker and Jan Schakowsky.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

The media watchdog group Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting has in recent days highlighted the fact that public television’s Charlie Rose show has provided an absurdly one-sided take on the debate about how to address the federal deficit.

"(The) Rose show’s discussion of the White House deficit commission has been dominated by right-leaning guests who were supportive of the plan put forward by commission co-chairs Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson," argued FAIR in a pointed critique issued November 16.

That critique noted that — and an action alert associated with it — pointed out that economist Dean Baker and other experts had skewered the report of the commission co-chairs as "fundamentally flawed."

Tonight, Rose will feature Baker—who works with the the Center for Economic and Policy Research—on his program, along with Illinois Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky, a member of the deficit commission who has developed a progressive alternative to the Simpson-Bowles proposal. Unlike the co-chairs, Schakowsky protects Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

FAIR’s claiming victory—graciously.

 "FAIR thanks those who wrote to the Charlie Rose Show and encouraged them to expand their guest list. And the Charlie Rose show should be commended for taking these criticisms seriously," the group announced this afternoon. "The fact that the program is broadening its discussion is a testament to the power of media activism."

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x