Congress Launches Investigation into Taliban Payola

Congress Launches Investigation into Taliban Payola

Congress Launches Investigation into Taliban Payola

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Aram Roston’s November Nation exposé, "How the U.S. Funds the Taliban," has been fast picking up steam on Capitol Hill. In the article, supported by the Investigative Fund at The Nation Institute, Roston detailed how hundreds of millions of dollars in U.S. taxpayer funds are being funneled to Afghan insurgents, including the Taliban. The funds, he found, are used as bribes to secure safe passage of U.S. and Coalition supplies on Afghanistan trucking routes. U.S. and Afghanistan officials as well as private contractors all confirmed that such payola is rampant.

On December 2, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton acknowledged Roston’s findings in a hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee. "There’s a lot of evidence," she said, "that, in addition to funding from the Gulf and the illegal narcotics trade, that siphoning off contractual money from the international community…is a major source of funding for the Taliban." Days later, the spokesman for NATO’s forces in Afghanistan acknowledged that contracting dollars might be making it into Taliban hands.

Then yesterday, the House Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs announced a "comprehensive" investigation into the Department of Defense’s multibillion dollar Host Nation Trucking contract and related logistics contracts in Afghanistan. The inquiry will be led by the subcommittee’s chair, Rep. John Tierney of Massachusetts.

Tierney cited the Nation cover story in his press release announcing the investigation and reiterated the grave questions raised by Roston’s report:

"Serious allegations have been brought to the Subcommittee’s attention that private security providers for U.S. transportation contractors in Afghanistan are regularly paying local warlords and the Taliban for security. After a preliminary inquiry, it has been determined these reports warrant a full-scale Subcommittee investigation. If shown to be true, it would mean that the United States is unintentionally engaged in a vast protection racket and, as such, may be indirectly funding the very insurgents we are trying to fight."

Tierney has begun seeking documents from the Department of Defense and key companies connected to the $2.1 billion U.S. logistics contract in Afghanistan.

The story has taken on increased significance since President Obama announced his "surge" in Afghanistan. It would certainly be more than a little bit "bizarre," in the words of The New Statesman, if more U.S. funds poured into Afghanistan meant, simply, more U.S. funds ending up in Taliban hands.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x