Dangerous Experiment for Deficit Hawks

Dangerous Experiment for Deficit Hawks

Dangerous Experiment for Deficit Hawks

David Leonhardt, writing in the New York Times, quotes source after source saying, "The world’s rich countries are now conducting a dangerous experiment."

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Top economics writers are sending some scary signals this week. Just as June unemployment numbers are due, Paul Krugman’s declaring that we could be headed for a third Depression, and David Leonhardt, also writing in the New York Times, quotes source after source saying, “The world’s rich countries are now conducting a dangerous experiment.”

The dangerous experiment, both writers agree, is the idea of belt-tightening when more spending is needed, of letting stimulus lapse when most people are still struggling for jobs. During the Great Depression, when business started to improve, Roosevelt vowed to balance the budget—and sent the country back into decline. The only thing that yanked the economy into a different direction was the buildup to war and war itself.

We’ve got better ideas than that, now, right? Maybe not. A year ago, former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers told the BBC at Davos that ’90s-style growth simply isn’t coming back. Yet, shunning a government jobs-creation scheme, the president’s still hoping against hope for private industry created jobs. No reason to believe the private sector will do anything different than what its done these last two years. Productivity’s up with slashed wages and workers. The private sector’s doing fine. And now the deficit hawks are circling.

So what’s the plan, Uncle Sam? In many places, the military’s the only job offer out there. Democrats in Congress just cut $13B from schools to fund $33B on Afghan escalation. Maybe that’s the plan.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x