December 13, 2003: Saddam Hussein Is Captured

December 13, 2003: Saddam Hussein Is Captured

December 13, 2003: Saddam Hussein Is Captured

“Neither the overthrow of the Baathist regime nor Saddam’s capture can erase the fact that Washington helped prop up Saddam for years.”

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

When Saddam Hussein was found hiding in a “spider-hole” near his hometown of Tikrit, the Bush administration heralded the development as yet one more signal of an American victory, despite the fact, as The Nation observed in its editorial, “Saddam’s Inglorious End,” that an insurrection was developing throughout the country, one which had very little to do with Hussein’s involvement.

“The enemies of a free Iraq have lost their leader,” said George Bush following the capture of Saddam Hussein. To many people’s eyes, the lone derelict crouching in a six-foot-deep “spider hole” hardly seemed the mastermind of the insurrection. Yes, his capture is good news for the Iraqi people. Their ex-dictator can now be held to account for the fearful crimes and atrocities that pocked his reign—hanging innocent Jews in Baghdad in 1969; ordering a third of Baath Party officials shot in 1979; invading Iran and decimating a generation of young men; gassing the Kurds in 1988; massacring Shiites and marsh Arabs after the first Gulf War; ceaseless arbitrary arrests and executions. That said, Bush’s incipient triumphalism seems an attempt to inflate the arrest of Saddam into a justification for his illegal war.…

At most, the former dictator was a rallying symbol for a restoration, but that prospect instilled dread in the hearts of most Iraqis who had come to loathe him. Many Iraqis, Sunnis as well as Shiites, may actually feel emboldened to resist US troops now that Saddam has no chance of coming back. As for the Islamists coming in from other countries, they were never fond of Saddam.…

We hope that the trial of Saddam Hussein will be fairly conducted and enable Iraqis to purse their dark past. For Americans the trial should provide some lessons: Neither the overthrow of the Baathist regime nor Saddam’s capture can erase the fact that Washington (and other Western powers) helped prop up Saddam for years. It will be said that such things matter little now that the dictator is in custody. Such a view suits our ethos, our indifference to history; it is also the privilege of the victor to wipe the slate clean and forget the past—but that is a luxury we can ill afford. The rise of Saddam Hussein is as much a part of US history as is his fall.

December 13, 2003

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x