Dems Fail to Curtail Bank Reform Debate

Dems Fail to Curtail Bank Reform Debate

Dems Fail to Curtail Bank Reform Debate

Harry Reid tried to shut down the debate on financial services reform. Republicans and responsible Democrats blocked the move. They were right to do so.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is in a rush to pass financial services regulatory reform legislation—even if the reforms are insufficient to protect consumers and avoid another meltdown moment.

Senate Banking Committee chair Chris Dodd, the Connecticut Democrat who is ready to retire, is similarly inclined.

Reid and Dodd thought they had the 60 votes they needed to end the debate on reforming the way that Wall Street does business. They even had some Republican allies who were willing to back a cloture call.

But when the cloture vote came Wednesday afternoon, Reid could only muster 57 votes—those of 55 Democratic caucus members and Republicans Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine.

Where were the other three Democratic votes that Reid needed?

Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter did not vote, presumably because he was still recovering from his not-a-victory party after Tuesday´s Democratic primary loss.

But the two key `no´ votes came from two Democrats who have been supporters of real reform—Wisconsin´s Russ Feingold and Washington´s Maria Cantwell.

Said Feingold: “After thirty years of giving in to the wishes of Wall Street lobbyists, Congress needs to finally enact tough reforms to prevent Wall Street from driving our economy into the ditch again.  We need to eliminate the risk posed to our economy by ‘too big to fail’ financial firms and to reinstate the protective firewalls between Main Street banks and Wall Street firms.  Unfortunately, these key reforms are not included in the bill.  The test for this legislation is a simple one – whether it will prevent another financial crisis.  As the bill stands, it fails that test.  Ending debate on the bill is finishing before the job is done."

Feingold, one of only eight senators who had the good sense to vote in 1999 against tearing apart the regulatory structure that Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his congressional allies erected as a firewall between Wall Street investment firms and Main Street banks, is of course correct.

Reid and Dodd want to pass a bill—no matter how lame the legislation may be.

Feingold and Cantwell want real reform. And the American people should hope they get it.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x