Department of Justice To Fund Research On Campus Sex Assault Policies

Department of Justice To Fund Research On Campus Sex Assault Policies

Department of Justice To Fund Research On Campus Sex Assault Policies

The US Department of Justice seeks answers in the wake of a nation-wide sexual assault epidemic on college campuses.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

This article was originally published by the The Daily Californian and is reposted here with permission.

The U.S. Department of Justice is seeking new applicants to research how colleges experiment with methods of responding to campus sexual assault cases.

The department’s National Institute of Justice, alongside the Office on Violence Against Women and Office of Justice Programs, is opening applications nationwide and will provide a grant for researchers to examine the handling of campus sexual assault complaints. The justice institute hopes to shed light on newer, more promising methods of addressing sexual assault on college campuses, the proposal said.

The program comes in response to the April 2014 White House Task Force Report to Protect Students From Sexual Assault, which advocated improved understanding of campus sexual assault investigations and adjudications on campuses.

In May of last year, the White House released a list of universities, including UC Berkeley and three other California schools, under investigation for possible violations of federal law over the handling of sexual violence and harassment complaints.

According to the proposal, applicants for the grant must be the entity with primary responsibility for conducting and leading the sexual assault research.

Campus spokesperson Janet Gilmore and UC spokesperson Brooke Converse could not provide information on whether UC Berkeley, or any UC campus, will apply for the grant.

In July, UC President Janet Napolitano assembled a task force on sexual harassment. In September, the task force presented to the UC regents its recommendations, which included the adoption of systemwide investigation and adjudication standards by July 2015.

“There is an ongoing national dialogue on (methods of responding to campus sexual assault complaints) and it’s one of the issues being discussed by … Napolitano’s task force on sexual harassment and sexual violence,” Gilmore said in an email.

ASUC Student Advocate Rishi Ahuja felt that the campus should focus on addressing its own campus policies. He noted that he was not sure what the study could accomplish for the campus and that what is required now is “implementation and strict enforcement of policies.”

Some students, including UC Berkeley junior Meghan Warner, director of the ASUC Sexual Assault Commission, are concerned with the dangers of campuses researching their own statistics.

Warner said she believes that if the campus were allowed to conduct its own research, it might “try to put the campus in a better light.”

“It would be a waste of funding that would not help students,” Warner said.

Nevertheless, others believe that applying for and receiving the grant could potentially supplement Napolitano’s current task force operations.

“The task force is great in theory,” said Aryle Butler, a UC Berkeley senior and member of survivor advocacy organization End Rape On Campus. “But there is currently no mechanism to police those rules — the DOJ grant is a good initiative to analyze our campus more objectively.”

Butler added that, provided the campus decides to apply for and receive the grant, there should be an additional layer of oversight and protection to the research to ensure that statistics are not deflated or inflated.

 

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x