Dissent and Disconnects

Dissent and Disconnects

History was made on February 27 when for the first time Big Labor formally broke with a sitting President’s war policy.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

History was made on February 27 when for the first time Big Labor formally broke with a sitting President’s war policy. By unanimous vote, the executive council of the AFL-CIO, representing America’s 13 million unionized workers, approved a resolution stating, “The president has not fulfilled his responsibility to make a compelling and coherent explanation to the American people and the world about the need for military action against Iraq at this time.”

Labor’s enlistment into the cause of peace came as thousands of Americans jammed fax and phone lines in a “Virtual March on Washington,” and as college and high school students planned a March 5 event that saw walkouts of classes across the country. The list of cities, including most recently Los Angeles, that have gone on record against the war now numbers more than a hundred. Resistance to the drive for war also stiffened in Europe, where–even after its government was offered what amounted to a multibillion-dollar bribe, the Turkish Parliament voted to prohibit US troops from using its soil as a staging area. In Paris the foreign ministers of France, Germany and Russia said they would “not allow” passage of a United Nations Security Council resolution that would be used as an authorization for war.

George W. Bush, however, seems unfazed. As Iraq was complying with UN inspectors’ demands to destroy its Al Samoud missiles, he went on national TV to ratchet up the war rhetoric. In an updated version of the White Man’s Burden, Bush shifted his rationale for war away from disarmament and argued that it is the moral duty of America to liberate Iraq and usher in a new era of regional democracy–albeit at gunpoint. Meanwhile, attempting to secure the fig leaf of UN approval for its war plans by any means necessary, the Administration went so far as to deploy a massive surveillance and phone-tap scheme, spying on UN diplomats from countries whose votes are needed.

Despite such behavior, Congress remains, for the most part, a mute bystander. One exception is a lawsuit brought by a dozen members, along with serving soldiers and parents of troops, that seeks to bar the President from ordering an attack on Iraq without a Congressional declaration of war. After being dismissed by a lower court, the suit was given respectful attention by a three-judge appeals court panel in Boston, which heard oral arguments on March 4 and asked for briefs in the case. In the Senate, senior Democrats Robert Byrd and Edward Kennedy have sponsored resolutions that call on the Administration to continue support of UN weapons inspections and express the sense of the Senate that the President must return to Congress for a second vote before initiating the use of force. In the House, legislation sponsored by Democrat Peter DeFazio and Republican Ron Paul to repeal last October’s authorization of force has attracted thirty-five co-sponsors. Elsewhere on the political landscape, former Vermont Governor Howard Dean and Congressman Dennis Kucinich are finding support for their presidential peace candidacies.

While none of the Congressional initiatives have received much public attention, the bum economy, stagnating in part because of investors’ war jitters, has caught the attention of just about everyone. No surprise, then, that support for Bush’s 2004 election has fallen below 50 percent for the first time. That Bush’s presidency could face the same end as his father’s is little recompense for the damage this war would wreak on democratic principles.

Support independent journalism that exposes oligarchs and profiteers


Donald Trump’s cruel and chaotic second term is just getting started. In his first month back in office, Trump and his lackey Elon Musk (or is it the other way around?) have proven that nothing is safe from sacrifice at the altar of unchecked power and riches.

Only robust independent journalism can cut through the noise and offer clear-eyed reporting and analysis based on principle and conscience. That’s what The Nation has done for 160 years and that’s what we’re doing now.

Our independent journalism doesn’t allow injustice to go unnoticed or unchallenged—nor will we abandon hope for a better world. Our writers, editors, and fact-checkers are working relentlessly to keep you informed and empowered when so much of the media fails to do so out of credulity, fear, or fealty.

The Nation has seen unprecedented times before. We draw strength and guidance from our history of principled progressive journalism in times of crisis, and we are committed to continuing this legacy today.

We’re aiming to raise $25,000 during our Spring Fundraising Campaign to ensure that we have the resources to expose the oligarchs and profiteers attempting to loot our republic. Stand for bold independent journalism and donate to support The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel

Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x