Equal Obliviousness, Not Equal Rights

Equal Obliviousness, Not Equal Rights

Although pundits galore like to do it—a lot—it makes no sense to lump the sexes into undifferentiated groups.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

The Atlantic published one of many recent articles about the "he-cession" or the "decline of men," wondering what it means that women are now the majority of the workforce, the majority of breadwinners, et cetera. "What if the economics of the new era are better suited to women?" asked author Hanna Rosin.

Not so fast. After all, the majority of power positions—the presidency, Congress, CEOs and boardrooms—are still filled with men. And although pundits galore like to do it—a lot—it makes no sense to lump the sexes into undifferentiated groups.

As Daisy Hernandez at ColorLines points out: The "He-cession" could be properly termed a "black-cession." White men still have a lower than average unemployment rate (8.8 percent), while black men are soaring over it—at 17 percent. Our still-segregated school system still plays a role—the so-called school-to-jail pipeline doesn’t typically funnel more white males to prison than college.

Sure, upper-class white women may be moving into some more positions of power—take former CEOs Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina, now buying their way into politics. But Rosin’s idea of a "sisterhood" involves domestic jobs opening up when those women go to work—which, Hernandez points out, means women of color cleaning affluent houses. That’s not exactly the sisterhood we’d been thinking of.

More gender equality at the top’s a fine thing, as Melissa Harris-Lacewell pointed out here last month. But let’s not pretend that privileged white women catching up to white men as the whole economy tanks is synonymous with liberation for the gender. As we’ve seen with the "year of the right-wing women" in politics, sometimes equality is simply being as oblivious to privilege as those stuffed shirts that came before you.

The F Word is a regular commentary by Laura Flanders, the host of GRITtv which broadcasts weekdays on satellite TV (Dish Network Ch. 9415 Free Speech TV) on cable, and online at GRITtv.org and TheNation.com. Support us by signing up for our podcast, and follow GRITtv or GRITlaura on Twitter.com.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x