February 4, 1899: Fighting Erupts Between the Philippines and the United States

February 4, 1899: Fighting Erupts Between the Philippines and the United States

February 4, 1899: Fighting Erupts Between the Philippines and the United States

Somehow, The Nation lamented, “we got hold of the notion that it would be a good thing to annex 1,200 islands at the other end of the world.”

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

After losing to the United States in Cuba, Spain attempted to cede possession of the Philippines to the United States, then entering the business of empire. But Filipino nationalists led by Emilio Aguinaldo thought the people themselves ought to have some say, and The Nation agreed. In an editorial titled “The End of the Beginning” (February 2, 1899), founding editor E.L. Godkin took direct aim at all of the idiotic assumptions underlying the American imperial project. In an interesting twist that many who claim the anti-imperialist mantle would prefer to forget, however, Godkin himself (and others of his ilk) often framed their argument against colonizing distant lands by describing the inhabitants of those places as backward and unready, or even unworthy, of the bounties of Anglo-American democracy. Even so, many of Godkin’s arguments against going to war for control of the Philippines could have been written in more recent years, when the United States again set off to conquer lands inhabited by people about whose wishes we knew, often by choice, next to nothing.

However the thing now goes, there are certain reflections which no enlightened and civilized man can escape. We have apparently rushed into this business with as little preparation or forethought as into the Cuban war. We got hold of the notion that it would be a good thing to annex 1,200 islands at the other end of the world, simply because we won a naval victory over a feeble Power in the harbor of one of them, and because people like [Attorney-General John W.] Griggs of New Jersey wanted some “glory.” We then went to work to buy 1,200 islands without any knowledge of their extent, population, climate, productions, or of the feelings, wishes, or capacity of the inhabitants. We did not even know their number. While in this state of ignorance, far from trying to conciliate them, assure them of our good intentions, disarm their suspicions of us—men of a different race, religion, and language, of whom they had only recently heard—we issue one of the most contemptuous and insulting proclamations a conqueror has ever issued, announcing to them that their most hated, and secular enemy had sold them to us, and that if they did not submit quietly to the sale we should kill them freely. This was bad enough, but what made it worse was that it was all, as a matter of fact, untrue. Is there in any history but Spanish history a record of statesmanship like this?

February 4, 1899

To mark The Nation’s 150th anniversary, every morning this year The Almanac will highlight something that happened that day in history and how The Nation covered it. Get The Almanac every day (or every week) by signing up to the e-mail newsletter.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x