Four Plans to Finish Off the Filibuster

Four Plans to Finish Off the Filibuster

Four Plans to Finish Off the Filibuster

Nation DC Editor Christopher Hayes discusses the ways that Democrats could get rid of the filibuster.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Filibuster reform may be boring, but Rachel Maddow urges viewers to take
the issue more seriously because “a tiny minority cannot thwart the
will of the majority anymore.” After viewers’ attempts to possibly
“re-brand” the soporific filibuster, Nation DC Editor Chris Hayes
answers the question: “Could Democrats get rid of the filibuster
tomorrow, if they really wanted to?”

The answer, he says, is a qualified yes. Hayes proposes four ways to get
rid of the filibuster including: changing Senate rules, i.e. the cloture rule, (that requires 67 votes); statutorily, which requires passing a bill with 60 votes to change the rule (Senator Tom Harkin has proposed this), or even using the nuclear option, where they could eliminate the filibuster with 50 senators and vice presidential approval. “There have been moments in which procedural
changes have happened in the Senate,” he says. “It happened after World
War I. It happened after Watergate in the 1970s. And in every case, it
wasn’t a procedural change so much as a political change.”

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x