Going Postal

Going Postal

Bravo and Happy Birthday to Harper’s Magazine, and to Lewis Lapham and John (Rick) MacArthur (editor and publisher, respectively).

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Bravo and Happy Birthday to Harper’s Magazine, and to Lewis Lapham and John (Rick) MacArthur (editor and publisher, respectively). In late May the esteemed monthly celebrated 150 years of distinguished publishing even as hundreds of literati descended on New York’s Grand Central Station and danced to “Alexander’s Ragtime Band” and other vintage standards to mark the occasion. And felicitations to Anne Fadiman (editor) and The American Scholar, which, the same night, down the street between Fifth and Sixth avenues, celebrated its 275th issue, which included among other elegant pieces Stephen Jay Gould’s love song to Gilbert and Sullivan, “The True Embodiment of Everything That’s Excellent.”

And, indeed, at their best that’s what these periodicals are–the embodiment of everything that’s excellent. How discordant, then, is the note sounded by the US Postal Service, which has proposed a rate increase that would penalize publications like Harper’s and The American Scholar. Here at The Nation it would raise mailing costs by 18.6 percent, or $140,000. That’s what the paper for nineteen issues costs us; our annual editorial budget for freelance writers is $250,000.

As we told the Postal Rate Commission in 1995, when it was considering a proposal to eliminate second-class mail entirely, we believe that the Founding Fathers correctly saw the dissemination of opinion as the precondition of self-governance. That’s why George Washington himself believed that all newspapers, which in those days were the equivalent of journals of opinion, should be delivered free. Maybe someday e-mail will make that possible, but right now the postal system continues to constitute the circulatory system of our democracy.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x