Is the New Cold War Trending in Russia’s Favor from Syria to Europe?

Is the New Cold War Trending in Russia’s Favor from Syria to Europe?

Is the New Cold War Trending in Russia’s Favor from Syria to Europe?

And will it leave the United States increasingly isolated?

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Nation contributing editor Stephen F. Cohen and John Batchelor continue their weekly discussion of the new US-Russian Cold War. Having just returned from Moscow, Cohen reports on several notable developments in Russia. President Vladimir Putin, systematically demonized in the United States as a Stalin-Hitler-like leader, is widely credited by knowledgeable Russians with having personally authorized the opening, on October 30, of a large Museum of the History of the Gulag and the building of a monument, in central Moscow, of a memorial to Stalin’s millions of victims.

Second, Cohen observes the traditional, non-traumatic ways Russians are coping with economic hardships imposed by Western sanctions and the fall in world prices for Russian energy. And third, he discusses the widespread Russian puzzlement over why the US government is opposing, even denouncing, Putin’s air war in Syria (and now Iraq) against the Islamic State.

More generally, Cohen and Batchelor discuss the trending of European political support toward Moscow, not Washington, due largely, though not only, to European hope that Putin’s war against the Islamic State will end the refugee crisis that now threatens the foundations of the European Union. Among the signs of this development is the crisis of German chancellor Merkel’s pro-Washington leadership. In this connection, the unrelenting Putin-bashing in the US political-media establishment is also discussed, raising the question: Is it the Obama Administration, not Putin’s Russia, that is now “isolated” in international affairs?

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x