It’s Detention Time for Sex Education Teachers

It’s Detention Time for Sex Education Teachers

It’s Detention Time for Sex Education Teachers

Is sex education a crime? A Wisconsin District Attorney is warning teachers to stop teaching sexual education or they’ll face prosecution and possible time in jail.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

If putting a condom on a banana leads to sexual assault, then teaching someone to buckle a seatbelt must lead to drunk driving. Makes sense. At least, that’s how a Wisconsin District Attorney sees it.

In a March 24 letter addressed to five Wisconsin school districts, Scott Harold Southworth of Juneau County is urging schools to drop their sexual education programs for fear of criminal liability and promoting the “sexualization” and “sexual assault” of children.

The letter specifically condemns Wisconsin’s Healthy Youth Act (2009 Wisconsin Act 134), enacted in early March. If the teachers continue, Southworth has warned he may prosecute instructors for contributing to the delinquency of minors.

Southworth’s main axe grinding is where the act states that sexual education programs shall address age-appropriate pupils re the “health benefits, side effects, and proper use of contraceptives and barrier methods…”

Translation? “Forcing our schools to instruct children on how to utilize contraceptives encourages [sic] our children to engage in sexual behavior, whether as a victim or an offender,” he writes. “It is akin to teaching children about alcohol use, then instructing them on how to make mixed alcoholic drinks. While it is true that some children will wrongly choose to engage in sexual behavior before entering adulthood, our school districts should never [sic] promote illegal activity.”

Yes, it’s true; school districts should never promote illegal activity. But are Wisconsin’s sexual education programs truly promoting sexual acts with minors, as Southworth believes? He writes that if an instructor teaches sex ed to a minor whom they know is sexually active, or, if a child then becomes inclined to engage in sex with another “child” after the instruction, the teacher can face 9 months of jail and up to six years of prison. Why? Because they intentionally contributed to the delinquency.

Here’s another lesson. The Act states: “A volunteer health care provider may provide instruction in human growth and development if the instructional program is in compliance with requirements of s.188.019.”

Translation? “Now, schools can utilize these ‘health care providers,’ who may come in the form of contraceptive industry representatives (e.g. employees of Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion and contraceptive provider, which lobbied in favor of this new law) and who can effectively market sexually-oriented products to our children,” he writes. “Our children receive enough [sic] sales pitches from television, magazines and radios–they should not be subjected to pandering by “volunteers” from local contraception businesses whose real interest is likely obtaining new, young customers.”

Surely that is Planned Parenthood’s intention. Go to a classroom, teach sexual education, and get new customers. It’s like advertising Happy Meals filled with condoms and birth control. It’s a win win!

Beyond the illegal implications, Southworth hardly discusses that these “children” are already having sex and will have more sex. His wisdom of protecting children during their “most innocent years” also fails to mention that research shows sexual education does not promote an increase in sexual activity nor does it decrease the age youth begin having sex, nor does it increase the frequency of sexual encounters nor the number of sex partners among sexually active youth.

So, what should teachers do? Southworth does not offer a solution and he did not he respond for an interview. His letter continues to frighten teachers and students of the risque lesson plan for “illegal behavior”–sex education.

By Clarissa León

If putting a condom on a banana leads to sexual assault, then teaching someone to buckle a seatbelt must lead to drunk driving. Makes sense. At least, that’s how a Wisconsin District Attorney sees it.

In a March 24 letter addressed to five Wisconsin school districts, Scott Harold Southworth of Juneau County is urging schools to drop their sexual education programs for fear of criminal liability and promoting the “sexualization” and “sexual assault” of children.

The letter specifically condemns Wisconsin’s Healthy Youth Act (2009 Wisconsin Act 134), enacted in early March. If the teachers continue, Southworth has warned he may prosecute instructors for contributing to the delinquency of minors.

Southworth’s main axe grinding is where the act states that sexual education programs shall address age-appropriate pupils re the “health benefits, side effects, and proper use of contraceptives and barrier methods…”

Translation? “Forcing our schools to instruct children on how to utilize contraceptives encourages [sic] our children to engage in sexual behavior, whether as a victim or an offender,” he writes. “It is akin to teaching children about alcohol use, then instructing them on how to make mixed alcoholic drinks. While it is true that some children will wrongly choose to engage in sexual behavior before entering adulthood, our school districts should never [sic] promote illegal activity.”

Yes, it’s true; school districts should never promote illegal activity. But are Wisconsin’s sexual education programs truly promoting sexual acts with minors, as Southworth believes? He writes that if an instructor teaches sex ed to a minor whom they know is sexually active, or, if a child then becomes inclined to engage in sex with another “child” after the instruction, the teacher can face 9 months of jail and up to six years of prison. Why? Because they intentionally contributed to the delinquency.

Here’s another lesson. The Act states: “A volunteer health care provider may provide instruction in human growth and development if the instructional program is in compliance with requirements of s.188.019.”

Translation? “Now, schools can utilize these ‘health care providers,’ who may come in the form of contraceptive industry representatives (e.g. employees of Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion and contraceptive provider, which lobbied in favor of this new law) and who can effectively market sexually-oriented products to our children,” he writes. “Our children receive enough [sic] sales pitches from television, magazines and radios–they should not be subjected to pandering by “volunteers” from local contraception businesses whose real interest is likely obtaining new, young customers.”

Surely that is Planned Parenthood’s intention. Go to a classroom, teach sexual education, and get new customers. It’s like advertising Happy Meals filled with condoms and birth control. It’s a win win!

Beyond the illegal implications, Southworth hardly discusses that these “children” are already having sex and will have more sex. His wisdom of protecting children during their “most innocent years” also fails to mention that research shows sexual education does not promote an increase in sexual activity nor does it decrease the age youth begin having sex, nor does it increase the frequency of sexual encounters nor the number of sex partners among sexually active youth.

So, what should teachers do? Southworth does not offer a solution and he did not he respond for an interview. His letter continues to frighten teachers and students of the risque lesson plan for “illegal behavior”–sex education.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x