It’s Not Torture – Mao Agrees

It’s Not Torture – Mao Agrees

As noted in my last post, some conservatives have perused the contents of the newly released torture memos and concluded that they do not, in fact, authorize torture. Today’s New York Times informs us that these conservatives are not alone. As Scott Shane and Mark Mazzetti report in this excellent article, the SERE tactics authorized under Bush were created to give US soldiers and pilots a sample of the torture methods used by Communists during the Korean War. "The Communists do not look upon these assaults as ‘torture,’" a 1956 government study of shackling, sleep deprivation and other techniques used by Chinese Communists noted. The logic didn’t quite persuade the authors of the study:

 

But all of them produce great discomfort, and lead to serious disturbances of many bodily processes; there is no reason to differentiate them from any other form of torture.

 

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

As noted in my last post, some conservatives have perused the contents of the newly released torture memos and concluded that they do not, in fact, authorize torture. Today’s New York Times informs us that these conservatives are not alone. As Scott Shane and Mark Mazzetti report in this excellent article, the SERE tactics authorized under Bush were created to give US soldiers and pilots a sample of the torture methods used by Communists during the Korean War. "The Communists do not look upon these assaults as ‘torture,’" a 1956 government study of shackling, sleep deprivation and other techniques used by Chinese Communists noted. The logic didn’t quite persuade the authors of the study:

 

But all of them produce great discomfort, and lead to serious disturbances of many bodily processes; there is no reason to differentiate them from any other form of torture.

 

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x